Optimizing the ratio of two integrals

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aetherane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals Ratio
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around optimization problems involving the maximization of the ratio of two integrals, specifically focusing on the use of variational calculus to approach such problems. Participants explore general methods and specific conditions necessary for finding optimal functions within the context of integrals defined from 0 to infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the problem of maximizing the ratio of two integrals and questions the applicability of variational calculus in this context.
  • Another participant proposes a formulation using a perturbation approach with an arbitrary function that vanishes at the boundaries, suggesting a necessary condition for optimization.
  • A further contribution discusses a more general treatment of the problem, defining a functional and deriving a differential equation that must be satisfied by the function to be optimized.
  • In a later reply, a participant simplifies the differential equation derived earlier, presenting a specific solution but notes that it leads to a divergent integral in the denominator, raising concerns about the validity of the maximizing function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability and outcomes of the proposed methods. While some agree on the use of variational calculus and the formulation of the problem, there is no consensus on the existence of a valid maximizing function due to the divergence issue raised.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions made about the functions involved and the conditions under which the integrals are defined. The divergence of the integral in the denominator remains unresolved, affecting the conclusions drawn about the optimization problem.

aetherane
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Frequently, I have encountered optimization problems which involve finding the optimal function to maximize the ratio of two integrals (bounds from 0 to infinity). e.g: Maximize [tex]\frac{\int_0^\infty (g(x))^3 g'(x) dx}{\int_0^\infty (g(x))^3(1-g(x)) dx}[/tex]

I am aware that variational calculus works on a single integral, but is there a general approach that might work for these types of problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, variational calculus!


Define:
[tex]F(\epsilon)=\frac{\int_{0}^{\infty}(g(x)+\epsilon\gamma(x))^{3}(g^{,}(x)+\epsilon\gamma^{,}(x))dx}{\int_{0}^{\infty}(g(x)+\epsilon\gamma(x))^{3}(1-(g(x)+\epsilon\gamma(x)))dx}[/tex]
where [itex]\gamma(x)[/itex] is an arbitrary function that vanishes at the boundaries.

Now, a necessary condition in order to let [itex]\epsilon=0[/itex] be the maximum of F would be that [itex]\frac{dF}{d\epsilon}_{\epsilon=0}=0[/itex]

This condition will yield the differential equation g must satisfy.
 
Last edited:
To treat this problem in a somewhat general manner, let us assume that y's boundary values are fixed, say
[tex]y(a)=y_{a},y(b)=y_{b}[/tex]
We look then at the set of comparison functions:
[tex]Y(x,\epsilon)=y(x)+\epsilon\gamma(x),\gamma(a)=\gamma(b)=0[/tex]
That is, the [itex]\gamma[/itex]-function is arbitrary except for vanishing at the boundaries.

We have a functional,
[tex]F(\epsilon)=\frac{\int_{a}^{b}N(Y,Y^{,},x)dx}{\int_{a}^{b}D(Y,Y^{,},x)dx}[/tex]
and also define the quantities:
[tex]n=\int_{a}^{b}N(y,y^{,},x)dx, d=\int_{a}^{b}D(y,y^{,},x)dx (*)[/tex]

Now, differentiating F with respect to [itex]\epsilon[/itex] and then setting thederivative of F equal to 0 at [itex]\epsilon=0[/itex] yields, with some rearrangement:
[tex]\frac{\int_{a}^{b}(d(\frac{\partial{N}}{\partial{y}}-\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial{N}}{\partial{y^{,}}})-n(\frac{\partial{D}}{\partial{y}}-\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial{D}}{\partial{y^{,}}}))\gamma(x)dx}{d^{2}}=0[/tex]

Thus, we get the following diff.eq problem to solve:
[tex]d(\frac{\partial{N}}{\partial{y}}-\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial{N}}{\partial{y^{,}}})-n(\frac{\partial{D}}{\partial{y}}-\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial{D}}{\partial{y^{,}}})=0, y(a)=y_{a},y(b)=y_{b}[/tex]

The solution of this diff.eq problem will typically be a function of the two parameters d and n, (in addition of course, of being a function in x)!

In order to determine d and n, (*) represents a system of algebraic equations in d and n, so we solve this system to complete our solution.
 
Last edited:
In your case, the differential equation becomes exceedingly simple:
[tex]3g^{2}-4g^{3}=0[/tex]
where d and n vanish as determining parameters of the equation, and we retain an algebraic equation in g.

Thus, the only acceptable solution for a stationary point for the functional is [tex]g(x)=\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

However, since this yields a divergent integral in the denominator, that particular ratio cannot be said to have a maximizing (or minimizing) function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K