Order of steps on Hamiltonian canonical transformations

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3
Just a little doubt.

When we are performing a canonical transformation on a Hamiltonian and we have the equations of the new coordinates in terms of the old ones we have to find the Kamiltonian/new Hamiltonian using K = H +\frac{\partial G}{\partial t}. My question is: do we have to derive the generating function before or after substituting the old coordinates for the new ones?

For example, in a (q, p)\rightarrow(Q, P) that last derivative would be \frac{\partial G(q, p, t)}{\partial t} or \frac{\partial G(q(Q, P, t), p(Q, P, t))}{\partial t} =\frac{\partial G(Q, P, t}{\partial t}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carllacan said:
Just a little doubt.

When we are performing a canonical transformation on a Hamiltonian and we have the equations of the new coordinates in terms of the old ones we have to find the Kamiltonian/new Hamiltonian using K = H +\frac{\partial G}{\partial t}. My question is: do we have to derive the generating function before or after substituting the old coordinates for the new ones?

For example, in a (q, p)\rightarrow(Q, P) that last derivative would be \frac{\partial G(q, p, t)}{\partial t} or \frac{\partial G(q(Q, P, t), p(Q, P, t))}{\partial t} =\frac{\partial G(Q, P, t}{\partial t}?

The generating function is always a function of both old and new coordinates. So it would not be of the form ##G(q,p,t)## since that would be a function of only the old coordinates.

There are four possible forms: ##G(q,Q,t)##, ##G(q,P,t)##, ##G(p,Q,t)##, and ##G(p,P,t)##.

Suppose you have the form ##G(q,P,t)##. Then ##q## and ##P## would be considered independent variables in ##G##.

When taking the partial derivative ##\frac{\partial G(q,P,t)}{\partial t}## you would hold ##q## and ##P## constant while taking the derivative with resepct to ##t##.

Afterwards you could substitute for q in terms of ##Q## and ##P## in order to express ##\frac{\partial G(q,P,t)}{\partial t}## in terms of the new coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top