Organic Chemistry stable conformation question

AI Thread Summary
In the chair conformation, 1-bromo-tetrahydropyran is more stable in the axial position due to reduced steric hindrance and better charge distribution. The bromine, when axial, experiences less repulsion from the electronegative oxygen, allowing it to handle potential negative charge better if it leaves. The lone pairs on both bromine and oxygen contribute to LP-LP repulsion, which is minimized in the axial configuration. Additionally, having bromine axial allows for easier attachment of other molecules to the carbon, facilitating its departure. Overall, the axial position is favored for stability in this molecular structure.
DirtyD
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. In the chair conformation, why would 1-bromo-tetrahydropyran be more stable in the axial position, as opposed to the equitorial position? (Hint: consider how the bromo group affects the attached carbon and what the oxygen could do to alleviate that.)


2. No relevant equations


3. I am thinking this whole thing has to due with steric hinderance and charge sharing. I think that even though the bromine would be hindered with the pi bond electrons of the carbon in the axial position, it would be even more sterically hindered in the equitorial position with the oxygen. Also since bromine is a good leaving group, its relevant to think that the bromine could leave and there would be a resulting negative charge left with the molecule. Since the oxygen is highly electronegative, it could better handle the resulting negative charge. Also, with the bromine in the axial position, it would be easier for another molecule to attach to the carbon allowing for the bromine to leave.

Any help or critique of my thinking would be a great help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi
We can think or visualize it on the basis of electron pairs on O and Br .Both of them have lone pairs on them which can result in LP-LP repulsion .This can be the reason that Br is axial to O atom which is in the ring.You need to post the structure also so that I can think more clearly.Are you talking about 1 bromo or 2-bromo
In 1-bromo ,bromine is bonded to oxygen and in 2- bromo it is bonded to carbon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, I guess that would make it 2-bromo then. Some of us in the class talked about it today. We figured that the lone pairs from Br and O would have the repulsions as you mentioned. Also, we considered the fact that the EN from the O and Br would better be dispersed in the axial position as opposed to the equitorial. Any other thoughts?
 
Okay than we are good with this explanation only.We can also think in terms of big size of Br .
Since O is in the plane of the ring and all equatorial bonds are in the plane of the ring.So we can also say that when Br on second carbon is axial ,it minimizes steric repulsion .More suitable situation and favorable also.If you see this explanation again takes you on the first which we discussed on the basis of LP-Lp.What is steric repulsion?----repulsion among the electrons of the atoms or groups .
 
The anomeric effect was a big help. Thanx a bunch!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top