Orthogonal Transformations _ Benson and Grove on Finite Reflection Groups

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Grove and Benson's book on Finite Reflection Groups and am struggling with some of the basic linear algebra.

Some terminology from Grove and Benson:


V is a real Euclidean vector space

A transformation of V is understood to be a linear transformation

The group of all orthogonal transformations of V will be denoted O(V)


Then in chapter 2, Grove and Benson write the following:

If T [itex]\in[/itex] O(V), then T is completely determined by its action on the basis vectors [itex]e_1[/itex] = (1,0) and [itex]e_2[/itex] = (0,1).

If T[itex]e_1 = ( \mu , \nu )[/itex], then [itex]{\mu}^2 + {\nu}^2 = 1[/itex] and [itex]T e_2 = \pm ( - \nu , \mu)[/itex]

Can someone please help by proving why the last statement is true?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since your basis vectors only have two components, I assume that we're now dealing with the case V=ℝ2.

$$\begin{pmatrix}\mu\\ \nu\end{pmatrix}=Te_1=\begin{pmatrix}T_{11} & T_{12}\\ T_{21} & T_{22}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 0\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}T_{11}\\ T_{21}\end{pmatrix}$$ This is the first column of the matrix T. The columns of an orthogonal matrix are orthonormal. This is easy to see from the condition ##T^T T=1##. So the orthogonality of T implies that ##\mu^2+\nu^2=1##, and also that the second column has norm 1 and is orthogonal to the first.
 
Thanks Fredrik

Definitely dealihng with case [itex]\mathbb{R^2}[/itex]

Will just reflect on what you wrote!

Still puzzling a bit about showing that [itex]T e_2 = \pm ( - \nu , \mu)[/itex]

Peter
 
Math Amateur said:
Thanks Fredrik

Definitely dealihng with case [itex]\mathbb{R^2}[/itex]

Will just reflect on what you wrote!

Still puzzling a bit about showing that [itex]T e_2 = \pm ( - \nu , \mu)[/itex]

Peter
You know that Te2 is the second column of T, that ##(\mu,\nu)## is the first column, and that the columns are orthonormal. So you only have to prove that if ##(\alpha,\beta)\cdot (\mu,\nu)=0## and ##|(\alpha,\beta)|=1##, then ##(\alpha,\beta)=\pm(-\nu,\mu)##.
 
Thanks for the clarification Fredrik

Appreciate your help

Peter, Math Hobbyist