Orthogonality- Gram-Schmidt Process for Complex Sequences

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtfitzpatrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonality
gtfitzpatrick
Messages
372
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider L2, the inner product space of the complex sequences x = (xn) such that \sum xi converges,
with the inner product given by
<x,y> = (sum of) xi yi(complex conjugate)

Now let
x = (1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0...)
y = (1,i,0,i,0,i,0,0,0...)
z = (-1,1,i,-1,1,i,0,0..)

(xn = yn = zn for all n>7 = 0)

a) Is the set {x,y,z} an orthogonal set in L2?

b) If not use the Gram-Schmidth orthogonalization process to get an orthogonal set with the same span

Sol.

A) well i know it can't be orthogonal because if it was there wouldn't be a part b but i can't give that as an answer so for them to be orthogonal <x,y> = 0 but i get <x,y> = 1 so they are not orthogonal(but are orthonormal) so the answer is no, the set is not an orthogonal set in L2

i think I've got that right?

b) to apply Gram-schmidth you first have to remove 0 from the list

which i did giving
x = 1,1,1,0,0,0,0...
y = 1,i,i,i,0,0,0,0,..
z = -1,1,i,-1,1,i,0,0...

and then fill into the formula, but when i do this its not working out, is there something I am missing?

Thanks a mill for reading and sorry some of the code didn't work,i hope you can understand the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all...in part (a) you write that the set of vectors is orthonormal. This is not true: if a set of vectors are not orthogonal, then they are certainly not orthonormal.

Secondly, you are confusing the instuction about removing 0 from the set: it means you should remove the 0 vector if it appears in the set, NOT remove any zero entries in the vectors.
 
thanks for the reply,your right they obviously aren't ON either but i think i have shown that they are not orthogonal, right?

in second part, so it only the 0 vector i remove but leave the 0 entries in the vectors, thanks a million.
It still doesn't seem to be working out.is there something else I am missing.
im try to find 3 new sequences say u1,u2 and u3 i start with letting
x = u1
then
u2 = y- [<y,u1>/||u1||2] u1

u3 = z- [<z,u1>/||u1||2] u1 - [<z,u2>/||u2||2] u2

am i doing this right,its not working out?
Thanks for the help
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top