Orthogonality Problem (From Fourier Analysis Text)

GridironCPJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'm working through a majority of the problems in "A First Course in Wavelets with Fourier Analysis" and have stumbled upon a problem I'm having difficulty with. Please view the PDF attachment, it shows the problem and what I have done with it so far.

Once you have seen the problem and my work so far, what do you suggest I do for the next step? I thought about using the definition of the space D and setting everything less than or equal to the double integral of 1^(j+k_/2, which is just the double integral of 1 and you get xy, then I'm at a dead end, so perhaps that's not the correct route. Your ideas would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Before you dive into the math, think what these functions look like geometrically. The region is the unit circle...

You should be able to see "why" it is true geometrically, and therefore see how to prove it before you start writing down integrals.

(Hint: the word "circle" is in bold)
 
Another approach: You may also want to consider using the Cauchy-Goursat theorem, if you're familiar with it.

Think also of the exponential rep. e. Maybe this is what Aleph was suggesting.

BTW, your factorization is incorrect.

And, sorry to nitpick,but you're not really letting your θn's be in L2(D); they are there already; you're letting your θn's be given by (x+iy)n

EDIT: Cauchy-Goursat does not apply here, since the product function is not analytic.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I realized earlier that my expansion was incorrect. I used polar coordinates, so we start with

∫∫[(rcosθ+irsinθ)^j(rcosθ-rsinθ)^k]rdrdθ

From here I integrated with respect to r first and then I pulled in out and was left with

[r^(j+k+2)/j+k+2]∫(cosθ+isinθ)^j(cosθ-isinθ)^k dθ

where j≠k. I am not sure exactly how to proceed. Is there an expansion of (x+iy)^j(x-iy)^k that I am not thinking of? The value in the integrand will have the form cosθ^j+k+" "+/-isinθ^j+k, where the " " represents combinations of sinθcosθ's, which integrate to zero. So I'm left with the first and last terms, which should be zero if θ=∏, correct?

If my method or logic is not optimal, please point me in the right direction.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top