Oscillating String - Transverse Speed, what am I doing wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the transverse speed of a particle on an oscillating string, specifically at x = 1.24 cm and t = 1.13 s. The initial calculations yielded an incorrect speed of -32.9 cm/s, prompting a review of the method and calculator settings. It was discovered that the error stemmed from incorrect input in the calculator, particularly regarding the equation's parameters. After correcting the input and using a reliable tool, the correct transverse speed was confirmed to be 36.4 cm/s. The participant expressed relief at resolving the issue and obtaining the accurate answer.
Malavin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A string oscillates according to the equation
y´ = (0.654 cm) sin[(π/4.0 cm-1)x] cos[(24.2π s-1)t].
What are the (a) amplitude and (b) speed of the two waves (identical except for direction of travel) whose superposition gives this oscillation? (c) What is the distance between nodes? (d) What is the transverse speed of a particle of the string at the position x = 1.24 cm when t = 1.13 s?
Give your answers in centimeter-based units.

I only need help with part d, the other parts I have gotten right.
Here's my attempt at solving:

u = ∂y´/∂t = (0.654 cm) (24.2π s-1) sin[(π/4.0 cm-1)x] (-1) sin[(24.2π s-1)t]

Then, plugging in x and t:

u = (-0.654 cm) (24.2π s-1) sin[(π/4.0 cm-1)(1.24 cm)] sin[(24.2π s-1)(1.13 s)]

u = -32.9 cm/s

When I plug this solution in, I am told that it is not the correct answer. Even when I tried neglecting the negative sign. I am not sure how my calculations are wrong, but I would love to be enlightened!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method looks fine. I get a different number. Are you sure your calculator is in radian mode?
 
Oops! I looked at the equation again and it's π/4.0 cm-1, not 4.0π. That is what I used to get the result I did. I have gone back and edited my original post to reflect this. I hope that when calculated with π/4, you get the same thing as I do.

EDIT: Okay, apparently my method was right, but there is something wrong with my calculator. Just plugged in the numbers to Wolfram and received 36.4 cm/s which is the right answer.

Final Edit: Yes, I must have been using parentheses dumb or something. Just plugged it into my calculator again and got 36.4 cm/s. I feel dumb now, but I got the right answer after all! :)

Thank you for your help!
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top