Oscillation conditions: Feedback phase shift

AI Thread Summary
For oscillation to occur, a regenerative feedback loop must provide a 180-degree phase shift, which is essential for achieving the required n*360 degrees phase shift. The configuration of the amplifier affects this condition; for example, a common-source amplifier is inverting, while a common-drain configuration outputs in phase with the input. Negative feedback, synonymous with inverting amplifiers, cancels the phase shift introduced by the amplifier itself. The necessary phase shift applies only at the frequency of oscillation, and both inverting and non-inverting amplifiers can oscillate if the gain compensates for feedback network losses. Achieving inversion with low-gain non-inverting amplifiers may require additional components like transformers or transmission lines.
dalarev
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
One of the conditions for oscillation is that the (regenerative) feedback loop must provide a 180 degree phase shift. This is due to the fact that, for a regenerative effect, the signal must undergo n*360 degrees phase shift: 180 from the amplifier and another 180 from the feedback network.

My question is, doesn't this depend on the type of configuration used with the amplifier?

For instance, a common-source amplifier is an inverting configuration, so this condition would certainly apply. For a common-drain, or source follower, configuration though, the output is in phase with the input, isn't it?


That also brings up another doubt I have. I have never been able to "pin point" exactly what it is in an inverting configuration that makes...inverting. Some brief explanation would be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes the feedback oscillator requires a negative feedback amplifier.

Negative feedback is another way of saying inverting amplifier which is another way of saying 180 phase shift.

Another way of looking at the 180 phase shift required of the feedback network is that is simple cancels out the phase shift introduced by the amplifier, putting you back where you started.

Note the phase shift is only to be applied at the desired frequency of oscillation, at all other frequencies it is not 180.

Nor should you think the reason we use an inverting amplifier is that a non inverting one won't work.
It will oscillate all to well and we would likely loose control of it as the feedback is self reinforcing.

However neither type of amplifier will oscillate unless the gain is sufficient to compensate the losses in the feedback network. A phase shift network requires a gain of at least 29. Common drain or common collector amplifiers have a gain of just less than 1.
 
If you have no option but to use a non-inverting, low voltage-gain amplifier, you can achieve inversion (and voltage magnification) with a transformer or, at higher frequencies, some appropriate transmission line.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top