Oscillations and damping (air resistance)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on an experiment measuring how damping affects the amplitude of a pendulum's oscillation using a suspended meter ruler and varying surface areas of cardboard to create different levels of air resistance. The observed relationship appears to be exponential decay, attributed to the direct proportionality of air resistance to surface area. Continuous amplitude reduction occurs with each oscillation, suggesting that recording the amplitude after every swing could provide more detailed data. Suggestions include plotting 1/n or log(n) against the surface area to analyze the data further. For additional insights, reviewing the damped oscillator concept on Wikipedia is recommended.
tom12345
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If anyone could help with the following, it would be great.

I am currently carrying out an experiment for a school project to see how damping affects and reduces the amplitude of the oscillation of a pendulum. For the pendulum I am using a suspended metre ruler and I will count the number of oscillations before the ruler does not reach a certain amplitude anymore. To vary the level of damping, I am going to attach different surface areas of cardboard to the ruler and then plot a graph of surface area of cardboard (x-axis) verses the oscillation number (y-axis). Having just done this, I get what looks like an exponential decay relationship. Any suggestions or information on why this would be? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air resistance is directly proportional to surface area. So if you double your surface area, you'll double the air resistance.

It's also important to remember that amplitude decreases continuously and not discretely. Every oscillation will decrease the pendulum's amplitude. So it might be a good idea to record the amplitude of every oscillation of your pendulum
 
The oscillations of a damped oscillator do decay exponentially. But you're measuring something like the accumulated decay over a number of swings.

Try plotting 1/n or log(n) against area.

Have look at the damped oscillator in Wikipedia.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top