Otto Cycle Engine Homework: Total Work & Efficiency Calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the total work and efficiency of a six-cylinder Otto-cycle engine with a compression ratio of 10.6. Key calculations involve determining the total work done in one cycle, the heat released when the gas cools, and the efficiency comparison with a Carnot-cycle engine. The user grapples with thermodynamic relationships, particularly the efficiency formula η = 1 - r1-γ and the ideal gas law, to derive values for pressure, volume, and temperature at various points in the cycle. The user expresses confusion regarding the expected work output relative to the heat input, indicating a need for clarity in thermodynamic principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Otto-cycle engine mechanics
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic efficiency calculations
  • Knowledge of ideal gas laws and adiabatic processes
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for area calculations in pV diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Otto cycle efficiency formula η = 1 - r1-γ
  • Learn about the ideal gas law and its application in thermodynamic cycles
  • Explore adiabatic processes and their implications in engine cycles
  • Review pV diagrams and how to calculate work done in thermodynamic processes
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, particularly those focused on thermodynamics and engine design, will benefit from this discussion. It is also relevant for anyone involved in automotive engineering or energy efficiency analysis.

Recipi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A car has a six-cylinder Otto-cycle engine with compression ratio r = 10.6.

The diameter of each cylinder is 82.5 mm.

The distance that the piston moves during the compression stroke (see fig. 1) is 86.4 mm.

The initial pressure of the air-fuel mixture (at point a in fig. 2) is 8.50 x 10^4 Pa and the initial temperature is 300K (the same as the outside air).

Assume that 200 J of heat is added to each cylinder in each cycle by the burning petrol and that the gas has CV = 20.5 J.mol/K and γ = 1.40."

RK92bqw.png


(a) By considering the efficiency of the engine, calculate
(i) the total work done in one cycle in each cylinder of the engine, and
(ii) the heat released when the gas is cooled to the temperature of the air outside.

(b) Calculate the volume of the air-fuel mixture at point a in the cycle.

(c) Calculate the pressure, volume, and the temperature of the gas at points b, c, and d in the cycle. In a pV-diagram, show numerical values of p, V and T for each of the four states.

(d) Compare the efficiency of this engine with the efficiency of a Carnot-cycle engine operating between the same maximum and minimum temperatures

The Attempt at a Solution


(a)(i) has me completely baffled. I understand that the work is the area bounded by the two adiabats and the vertical isochors, but I don't see how this is related to the efficiency if η = 1 - r1-γ = 1 - (|QC| / QH).

That relation gives me a value for (a)(ii) of |QC| = QH*r1-γ - 200*10.6-0.4 = 77.8 J, though; is this on the right lines?

(b) I tried to use the relationship for an adiabatic process TVγ-1 = constant, so:
Ta(rV)γ-1 = TbVγ-1
However, the 'V' terms just cancel here. I then considered the ideal gas equation V=nRT/P, but there is no value for the number of moles of working substance.

(c) I think I will be able to do on my own once I am pointed in the right direction for (b); right now I feel like I am missing information I need to be able to do the question, but filling in the first few gaps should help me enough.

(d) Again, once I actually have the value the maximum temperature I can use the Carnot efficiency η = 1 - TC/TH to compare the value of η ≈ 0.611 for this Otto cycle. I suspect it should be lower given the nature of the Carnot engine?

My biggest problem with thermodynamics at the moment is a massive unfamiliarity with many of the key relations between variables; I have a nagging feeling I'm either overlooking the obvious or am unable to find the relationship that would make the questions tractable in my notes.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've had more of a look at (a)(i), and I've gotten a bit further, although unless I can use the efficiency to get past the problem I've encountered in my last line, I'm not sure I've done it the way the question wants (if it's right at all)?

8RV2wJY.gif


The issue now seems to be finding Td?

Edit: Okay, I think I got the efficiency into the picture, but the value I come out with seems ridiculous; 1320J of work for 200J heat input seems all kinds of wrong?

PzliSci.gif
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K