B Overview of identification methods

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter physea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identification
AI Thread Summary
Identification methods encompass various techniques including the use of microscopes, telescopes, and devices that detect electric or magnetic fields. The discussion emphasizes the need to determine relevant distinguishing factors and accurately measure them to classify objects effectively. Taxonomy plays a crucial role in this context, especially in relation to artificial intelligence, as it highlights the challenges AI faces in mimicking human classification processes. The conversation also notes that the thread should be categorized as B, indicating a general rather than advanced discussion. Overall, the topic underscores the complexity of identifying and classifying 'things' through multiple methods and parameters.
physea
Messages
211
Reaction score
3
Hello!
There are several methods to identify 'things'. For example, you can use magnetic field and its distortions will identify 'things'. Or you can use infrared light. Can you tell me please all the available methods? I am sorry I cannot word this better.
Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
physea said:
Can you tell me please all the available methods?

No, as the list would be far too long. But here are a few general categories:

Microscopes, optical and electron.
Telescopes and other optical devices for viewing things at a distance using EM radiation of any wavelength.
Devices that detect electric or magnetic fields.
Devices that physically touch something.

And more.

Also, this thread should be marked with a category of B, not A. Marking a thread as Advanced means you want a graduate-level discussion, with all the math involved. This is a B thread.
 
Drakkith said:
Also, this thread should be marked with a category of B, not A. Marking a thread as Advanced means you want a graduate-level discussion, with all the math involved. This is a B thread.
Done.

@physea -- post links to the reading you have been doing on this. Google is your friend.
 
physea said:
There are several methods to identify 'things'.
Your question is very open ended and there is no way to answer it fully but there are basic ideas which you could consider. There are two aspects to this problem (perhaps more). Firstly you have to decide on the relevant factors with which your 'thing' can be distinguished from other 'things' and to be able to measure enough of those factors accurately enough. That will give you a list of parameters which can be evaluated (measured) and you can assign 'qualities' to the thing. Then you need to compare set of parameters / qualities for your particular object with a set of similar parameters for other objects and decide how well your set match the set for another object. On some basis, you can classify your 'thing' as being part of a set of other 'things' by how many of the parameters are near enough the same.
The field of Taxonomy is particularly interesting in the context of Artificial Intelligence and it is a serious problem. Humans can be very inventive in deciding how to classify things - I believe the brain works basically in this way when dealing with everything - objects, actions or relationships between things. AI systems tend to need to be taught alternative ways of achieving this instinctive learning / memory process because most machines just do not work that way. Certainly, a conventional digital computer is very badly suited to that sort of thing.
Which particular aspect of this problem is your question aimed at?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top