Oxidation number in acidic medium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bandarigoda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Medium Oxidation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the redox reaction between Cr2O7^2- and H2S in an acidic medium, specifically focusing on the oxidation state of chromium. Participants clarify that the oxidation number of chromium in Cr2O7^2- is +6, which decreases to +3 in the reaction, indicating reduction. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding oxidation numbers as a tool for balancing redox reactions, while noting that they are properties of individual atoms rather than molecules. The need for experience in predicting oxidation numbers and balancing equations is highlighted, along with the suggestion that H2S can be oxidized to either elemental sulfur or sulfate, depending on the strength of the oxidizer. The completion of a balanced equation is also discussed, reinforcing that water and other species can be used to balance reactions in aqueous solutions.
Bandarigoda
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
In my school I was given a problem. It's that Cr2O7-2 + H2S in a acidic medium. And my teacher told that Chromium becomes Cr+3 .

I want to know is there such a way to calculate the oxidation number in acidic medium. Or is it required the experience?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
First, experience. When it fails, there are always Pourbaix diagrams.
 
Bandarigoda said:
Hi everyone,
In my school I was given a problem. It's that Cr2O7-2 + H2S in a acidic medium. And my teacher told that Chromium becomes Cr+3 .?

I've recently been trying to teach myself this stuff. Somebody let me know if this is way off base but this is a method that seems to work for me.

A neutral molecule has an overall oxidization number of zero, and a charged radical or ion has an overall oxidization number equal to it's charge.

So Cr2O7(2-) has an overall oxidization number of -2. The way I've been dealing with ones like this is to just assume the number of the simple atom (oxygen) and thereby deduce the number of the less obvious one (transition metal in this case).

Let the oxidization number of O be -2 and that of Cr be "n". Then,

2n + 7\times(-2) = -2

Solving for "n" the oxidization state of the Cr atom in Cr2O7(2-) must be +6.

If this becomes Cr(3+) on the right hand side of the balanced equation then the oxidization number of Cr is decreasing from 6 to 3, therefore Cr is being reduced in this process.

Disclaimer. I'm still on my Chemistry "L" plates :). So anyone please feel free to critic this answer if I'm wrong.
 
chemnoob said:
So anyone please feel free to critic this answer if I'm wrong.

You are for two reasons - one, it doesn't address the OP problem (which is how to predict ON of a product of the reaction), two, it is wrong as oxidation number is a property of an atom, not of the molecule. Cr2O72- has a _charge_ of -2, not oxidation number. Cr in Cr2O72- has oxidation number of +6 (which you calculated correctly).

Please note oxidation numbers are only an accounting device, handy when balancing redox reactions, but there is no measurable property of atoms that can be connected with ON. Which is why I prefer half reactions approach to balancing redox.
 
Borek said:
it is wrong as oxidation number is a property of an atom, not of the molecule. Cr2O72- has a _charge_ of -2, not oxidation number.
Ok. So is it still correct to say that the sum of the oxidization numbers (of the individual atoms) in a molecule must equal the charge, -2 in the above example?

it doesn't address the OP problem (which is how to predict ON of a product of the reaction),
To be honest I don't even know what the reaction products would be for that reaction, apart from the Cr^{\,3+} as that was given.

Does the OP need to complete a balanced equation something like as follows?

Cr_2O_7^{\,\,2-} + \, ? H_2S \, + \, ?? H_3O^{+} \rightarrow 2 Cr^{\,3+} + \, ?
 
I see. So it's up to my experience. I'll have to find more equations and solve them. Thanks for help guys.

Yes the overall charge is equal to -2
Cr is +6
So, 12 + (-14)=-2
 
@chemnoob balancing is not a problem for me as long as I know the oxidation number.
 
chemnoob said:
Ok. So is it still correct to say that the sum of the oxidization numbers (of the individual atoms) in a molecule must equal the charge, -2 in the above example?

Yes, that part is perfectly OK.

Trick is, sometimes assigning individual ONs is quite difficult. Try S2O32-.

To be honest I don't even know what the reaction products would be for that reaction, apart from the Cr^{\,3+} as that was given.

Does the OP need to complete a balanced equation something like as follows?

Cr_2O_7^{\,\,2-} + \, ? H_2S \, + \, ?? H_3O^{+} \rightarrow 2 Cr^{\,3+} + \, ?

Yes. In such cases hydrogen sulfide gets oxidized to elemental sulfur (when the oxidizer is mild) or to SO42- (when the oxidizer is strong). The important part is

Cr2O72- + H2S -> Cr3+ + SO42-

as all other molecules required for balancing (H2O, H+ and OH-) are always present in water solutions and they can be used freely whenever needed to balance charge, hydrogen and oxygen.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Back
Top