P(x)dx of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator

Buce
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The displacement of a harmonic oscillator is given by

x = A Cos(wt + Phi)

The phase angle phi is equally likely to have any value in the range 0 < Phi < 2Pi, so the probability W(Phi) that Phi lies between Phi and Phi + delta-Phi is delta-Phi/(2Pi). For a fixed time t, find the probability P(x)dx that x lies between x and x+dx by summing W(Phi)delta-Phi over all angles for which x lies in this range. Express P(x) in terms of A and x.

I know that for a harmonic oscillator, the total energy is

E = p^2/(2m) + kx^2/2

where the momentum p is

p = mx' = -mAwSin(wt + Phi)

I can solve the problem using px phase space, where the area between E and E+dE forms a elliptical band of area s, and P(x)dx = (dp/dE)(dE/ds)dx, but I'm only supposed to do it that way for the second part of the problem (which I won't reproduce here). If I did that part correctly, the answer is dx/(Pi Sqrt(A^2 - x^2)), but I'm having a hard time setting up the equations needed to evaluate an integral with respect to the phase angle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i've got the exact reverse problem. i can get your result by summing W(phi) over all angles for which x lies, but I'm off by a factor of 1/(mw^2A) when i try the ratio of areas in phase-space. let's help each other out
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top