Packing Earth with 1m Extra String - Unexpected Result?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wimms
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
Wrapping a string tightly around the Earth's equator and adding one meter to its length results in the string lifting off the ground by approximately 16 centimeters. This calculation is based on the Earth's circumference of about 40,000 kilometers and demonstrates that even a small increase in length can significantly affect the radius. The relationship can be expressed algebraically as a change in radius equal to the added length divided by 2π. This principle applies not only to the Earth but also to other celestial bodies, such as the Sun, where a similar increase in orbit would yield the same distance change. The exercise highlights the surprising nature of geometric relationships in circular motion.
wimms
Messages
489
Reaction score
0
This is simple exercise with unintuitive result, perhaps old as hell, but still surprising.

Suppose we wrap Earth with a string along equator, tightly, so that string is touching ground along its whole path. Assume Earth is perfect sphere. Length of this string would be calculated as circumference of earth.

Now imagine we add 1 meter to the total length of this string.

Question is: by how much would this string lift off ground if distance to the ground is kept uniform along whole length of it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The circumference of Earth is about 40,000km. A change of 1m is 1/400,000%. The radius is 6366.2km. A change of 1/400,000% is 16cm.

This could likely also be figured algebraically (spelled horribly wrong) since you can get the same result by plugging 1m into the radius of a circle equation.
 
Of course Russ, but you could let people less advanced discover this. :smile:

More general answer is that radius changes by L/2Pi where L is addition to circumference. So, if orbit of Earth around Sun were extended by 1meter, then Earth's distance to Sun would increase by 16cm. If Sun's orbit around galaxy was extended by 1 meter, then its distance to center of it would increase by 16cm..
I wonder if this was intuitively obvious to you?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
66
Views
6K
Replies
36
Views
112K
Back
Top