Design a Faster and More Efficient Parallel Bar Hinge System for Car Canopies

In summary, Ydeardorff is looking for help designing a system for a lifting canopy on a convertible car. He has identified a few problems with the current design, and is looking for an alternative cheaper way to make the system work more efficiently. He also wants to make the system internal below the body, so the actuator and all the links would be inside the car.
  • #1
ydeardorff
22
0
Hello to all,
I am not a mechanical engineer, I am a jack of trades though.

I am trying to solve a problem I see in a design an need your help to design a system for a lifting canopy on a car, the functions better than the current one.

Currently, the lifting system on this car, is constructed of two pieces of U channel with two bars mounted in the same channel. These bars and U channel act as the lifting hinge for the canopy of this car. The system is powered typically by a convertible car hydraulic pump, and two hydraulic rams connected directly to one of the arms.

See this video for an idea of the system:


However there are a few problems with its design.

The system is powered hydraulically. it is held up by hydraulic pressure, and held down the same way.

The roof will wriggle loose while driving in the down position.

The speed at which the roof opens and closes is appalling. sometimes more than 20 seconds to open it.

The goal, is to make a simple to make, multi-link system, to gain faster opening, and closing, a hydraulic timer to add in a 6 inch creep phase at the end of the stroke up or down, to prevent slamming at the end of the stroke. Also, using the cheapest parts available is preferred. The stroke is about 8 inches at the connection point shown in the video.

Some sort of cantilever arm link to create an over center mechanical lock to lock the top down is needed. Manufacturing these parts by hand is fine. Buying them is ok. But components bought off the shelf are very expensive for this system to make it fast. I am looking for an alternative cheaper way to make this happen more efficiently.

Im hoping you guys/gals would like a challenge and are willing to help.
If you need any more info I will get it to you as soon as I can.

Everytime I try to figure out how to make this system gain more mechanical advantage, and speed ends up equalizing each other out. I am not sure what I am missing. I even broke out my kids erector set to play with various mounting points to no avail.
Im looking at making the system internal below the body work (minus the bar hinge) so the actuator and all the links would be inside the body if possible.Thank you for your time.

ydeardorff
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF, Ydeardorff.
I'm starting to get an idea or two, but I need to think on it for a while.
Do you require the same sort of motion as is shown in the video? I ask only because I think that it would be easier to hinge the canopy at the front or back and swing it up as opposed to elevating the whole thing.
 
  • #3
yes the hinge system has to remain looking the same.
It is the trademark part of these cars.

But no one want to wait 20 seconds to get out of your open cockpit'ed cr when its raining out.
Nor does anyone like the hydraulic system letting the top loose whilst driving. LOL
 
  • #4
Hi ydeardorff. Most hydraulic systems I'm familiar with have some kind of valve or other flow restriction that limits the flow of hydraulic fluid through the circuit, and thus limits the speed that hydraulic actuators can operate at. I'd guess your system is the same. Trace the flow of hydraulic fluid from the pump/accumulator and see if you can identify where there might be a flow restriction. Many times it will be built into the hydraulic actuator itself. It could be a valve or orifice.

If that's what's causing the very slow movement, you may be able to change the speed simply by making an adjustment or changing the restriction. Problem may be that at the limits of the motion, your 'door' will impact much harder. If that's the case, you can add rubber stops or small, industrial shock absorbers. First, see if there's a restriction you can adjust or change.
 
  • #5
Thank you, I am working that end with a hydraulics technician as we speak.

The other thing I am trying to do is to hide the mechanism inside the body, making some sort of over center mechanical lock to prevent the top from coming loose from relying on hydraulic pressure to keep it closed. And lastly, find a way to keep the pressure equalized side to side, so there is no binding if one side goes down quicker than the other.
 
  • #6
ydeardorff said:
Thank you, I am working that end with a hydraulics technician as we speak.

The other thing I am trying to do is to hide the mechanism inside the body, making some sort of over center mechanical lock to prevent the top from coming loose from relying on hydraulic pressure to keep it closed. And lastly, find a way to keep the pressure equalized side to side, so there is no binding if one side goes down quicker than the other.
Bottom line is fairly simple in my mind. The geometry of the hinges and actuator can't be changed easily. If there's no restriction in the hydraulics, then the only help is to increase the flow capacity of the hydraulic pump. The overcenter mechanism is a good idea but I think it'll be difficult to make work. If it were me, and I wanted to do the overcenter mechanism idea, I'd make a scale drawing of the hinge and design it on CAD to make sure I had the right motion before I made it in metal. I'd also look at stresses in the parts. You could also look at velocities and accelerations and even do a full dynamic analysis, but that's probably going past what you're interested in.
 
  • #7
To start with, I wouldn't give any thought to a hydraulic 'timer' for the last bit of travel. Think of the way that a door closer or variable-rate shock absorber works. It will take a while for me to come up with a specific design, but basically you use two hydraulic circuits in the same system. One is very low-restriction for rapid movement. When your lid is about 90% down (and maybe also up), the piston covers the main port and uncovers one leading from a high-restriction feed, which results in slow travel for the remainder of the cycle.
Blocked flow should result in positive locking of the cylinder, so I'm not sure what's going on with that part. You can solve it by having a linkage that is tripped by the piston rod and pulls a locking lug into position.
 
  • #8
heres a picture with measurements if anyone needs it.
 

Attachments

  • MII_pivots.gif
    MII_pivots.gif
    5.6 KB · Views: 458

1. What is a parallel bar hinge system?

A parallel bar hinge system is a type of hinge that allows two bars to move in parallel with each other, typically at a 90-degree angle. It is commonly used in applications that require smooth and precise movement, such as in laboratory equipment, robotics, and furniture.

2. How does a parallel bar hinge system work?

A parallel bar hinge system consists of two bars that are connected by a hinge mechanism. When one bar moves, the other bar moves in the same direction at the same rate, maintaining a parallel orientation. This is achieved through a combination of mechanical linkages and pivoting joints.

3. What are the advantages of using a parallel bar hinge system?

A parallel bar hinge system offers several advantages, including smooth and precise movement, high load-bearing capabilities, and the ability to maintain parallel orientation. It is also compact and can be easily integrated into various designs.

4. How do I choose the right parallel bar hinge system for my application?

When choosing a parallel bar hinge system, consider factors such as load-bearing capacity, range of motion, and overall dimensions. It is also important to ensure compatibility with other components in your design and to choose a high-quality, durable hinge system for long-term use.

5. Can I customize a parallel bar hinge system for my specific needs?

Yes, many companies offer customizable parallel bar hinge systems to meet specific requirements. This can include modifications to the size, shape, materials, and load-bearing capacity of the hinge system. It is best to consult with a supplier or engineer to determine the best options for your application.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
848
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
15
Views
820
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • DIY Projects
Replies
8
Views
240
Back
Top