Parallel Plate Capacitor and Dielectrics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of an electroscope when exposed to charged rods, illustrating key principles of electrostatics. A negatively charged rod causes electrons in the electroscope to move away, leading to a negative charge and increased leaf separation. Conversely, a positively charged rod attracts electrons, resulting in a positive charge and also causing the leaves to repel. Grounding the electroscope alters its charge by allowing electron transfer, affecting the overall charge distribution. Understanding these interactions is essential for the lab on parallel plate capacitors and dielectrics.
scan
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have a lab to do tomorrow with this topic. Just wondering if anyone can tell me a brief summary of what this is about and what I should be looking to accomplish/learn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. A negatively charged rod is placed next to the neutral electroscope. This causes the electrons to gather away from the rod. There is a gather of negative charge and the leaves repel each other. Next, then the rod touches the electroscope, the electrons will be transferred to the electroscope. There is now a greater charge and the leaves separate more. When the rod is taken way, the electrons are spread evenly around the electroscope. The charge of the electroscope is negative.
When the negatively charged rod is placed next to the electroscope, the electrons will gather away from the rod and there is a concentration of negative charge so the leaves repel each other. When the positively charged rod is placed next to the electroscope, the negative charges will gather towards the rod and cause a less negative charge on the leaves, causing a reduced separation.

2. A positively charged rod is placed next to the neutral electroscope. This causes the electrons to gather closer to the rod. There is a separation of charge and the leaves repel each other. Next, then the rod touches the electroscope, the electrons will be transferred to the rod. There is now a greater positive charge and the leaves separate more. When the rod is taken way, the electrons are spread evenly around the electroscope. The charge of the electroscope is positive.
When the negatively charged rod is placed next to the electroscope, the electrons will gather away from the rod and cause a less positive charge, which reduces the separation. When the positively charged rod is placed next to the electroscope, the negative charges will gather towards the rod and cause a more concentrated positive charge causing more separation.

3. A negatively charged rod is placed next to the neutral electroscope. This causes the electrons to gather away from the rod. There is a gather of charge and the leaves repel each other. Next, the finger grounds electrons making less electrons in the electroscope. When everything is removed, the electrons will spread evenly around the electroscope.
When the negatively charged rod is placed next to the electroscope, the electrons will gather away from the rod and cause a less positive charge, which reduces the separation. When the positively charged rod is placed next to the electroscope, the negative charges will gather towards the rod and cause a more concentrated positive charge causing more separation.

4. A positively charged rod is placed next to the neutral electroscope. This causes the electrons to gather near the rod. There is a gather of charge and the leaves repel each other. Next, the finger transfers electrons into the electroscope. When everything is removed, the electrons will spread evenly around the electroscope.
When the negatively charged rod is placed next to the electroscope, the electrons will gather away from the rod and there is a concentration of negative charge so the leaves repel each other. When the positively charged rod is placed next to the electroscope, the negative charges will gather towards the rod and cause a less negative charge on the leaves, causing a reduced separation.

ps-try to post this in the homework section
 
thanks a lot!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top