Parallel resonance LC circuit question?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the resonance frequency of parallel LC circuits, exploring the derivation of impedance formulas and resonance conditions. Participants examine the mathematical relationships involved, including the effects of resistance in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the derivation of the impedance formula Z = L/CR at resonance frequency.
  • Others provide basic equations for parallel L and C circuits, noting that at resonance (when LC = 1/w²), the impedance Z approaches infinity.
  • A participant suggests that including a parallel resistor modifies the impedance, leading to Z being approximately equal to R at resonance.
  • There is a discussion about the role of the coil's resistance in the impedance formula, with some participants agreeing on the expression Z = L/CR under certain conditions.
  • One participant queries the meaning of the imaginary unit j and its relation to the square root of -1, indicating a lack of familiarity with complex numbers.
  • Another participant explains the mathematical basis for j² = -1, relating it to the time derivatives of circular functions.
  • A later post seeks clarification on deriving the resonance frequency w₀ when resistance is included, referencing a formula from Wikipedia and asking for advice on understanding the derivation of the (R/L)² term.
  • Another participant provides a method for simplifying the impedance equation to help clarify the derivation process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express confusion and seek clarification on various aspects of the resonance frequency and impedance calculations, indicating that multiple competing views and unresolved questions remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their understanding of complex numbers and their application in circuit analysis, which may affect their grasp of the discussed concepts.

uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
"At resonance frequency, the circuit impedance is maximum. It is resistive and its value is given L/Cr..."
The book doesn't explain how impedance equals L/Cr, so I'm confused here. How is it derived?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here are the basic equations for a parallel L and C, and no resistance. (w = 2 pi f)

1/Z = 1/jwL + jwC = jwC - j/wL = j(w2LC-1)/wL

So Z = jwL/(1-w2LC)

When LC=1/w2, Z= infinity

[Edit] If you also have a parallel resistor such that

1/Z = 1/jwL + jwC +1/R. then

Z =~ R at resonance.
 
Last edited:
But what about Z=L/C*R where R is the resistance of the coil if we don't neglect it?
 
How do we get that?
 
uzair_ha91 said:
But what about Z=L/C*R where R is the resistance of the coil if we don't neglect it?
Exactly right.
Using the same equations I posted earlier, , and the inductance has a small series resistance R, then

1/Z = 1/(jwL + R) + jwC

et cetera (like in prev. post), leading to (at LC resonance)

Z= (jwL + R)/jwCR.

If R<< jwL, then Z = jwL/jwCR = L/CR

(note: L/C has units ohms2. so L/CR has units ohms)
 
:-) Thanks!
 
uh, can you tell me why/how j2=-1?

Actually I'm studying high school physics so I'm studying the equations without the "j" operator or whatever it is..
 
By definition, j = sqrt(-1). So, obviously, j2 = -1 since that's the inverse operation. It's just the imaginary number; in mathematics sqrt(-1) = i. EEs like to use j because i already means current.
 
  • #10
uzair_ha91 said:
uh, can you tell me why/how j2=-1?

Actually I'm studying high school physics so I'm studying the equations without the "j" operator or whatever it is..
Hi uzair
There is a real physical basis for j2 = -1. As I showed in an earlier post, the time derivitaves of a circular function V(ωt) = V0 sin(ωt) are

d V(ωt)/dt = ω V0 cos(ωt) = jω V(ωt)

d2 V(ωt)/dt2 = -ω2 V0 sin(ωt) = (jω)2 V(ωt) = j2 ω2 V(ωt) = -ω2 V(ωt)

So you can see in red the shorthand notation for a 90 degree phase shift caused by taking the time derivative, and why j2 = -1.
Bob S
 
  • #11
Sorry for the bump, but I'm working on the problem including the series R with L, and can't seem to figure out how to derive the resonance frequency w_o in that case. Wikipedia lists it as w_0 = sqrt((1/LC) - (R/L)^2), where the impedance is only real.

I have the equation Zin = (R + jwL)/(jwRC-w^2*LC+1), which I have rearranged as

Zin = ((L/C) - jR(w/C))/(R + j(wL - 1/wc))

When I split up the fractions in the rearranged form, I can easily see where the 1/LC term comes from in w_0, but I'm having difficulty seeing how the (R/L)^2 term is derived. Any advice would be appreciated.
 
  • #12
Use Zin = -(R + jωL)/(1 + ω2LC -jωRC)

and multiply both numerator and denominator by 1 + ω2LC +jωRC

This will get the j out of the denominator. The denominator will be (1 + ω2LC)2 + (ωRC)2.

Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K