Parametric representation of a vector electric field

jjand
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See Attachment

Homework Equations



None I can think of

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm fairly certain that phi_yx is zero
Also I tried factoring out the cos and splitting up the equation into it's respective components, but to no avail. Am I even going about this correctly?
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2011-10-23 at 3.35.20 AM.png
    Screen shot 2011-10-23 at 3.35.20 AM.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 517
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The last bit is a typo. It should be \phi_{xy} = \phi_x.

I'm not sure what you mean by "splitting up the equation into its respective components" since the equation you're supposed to show is true is a scalar equation.
 
Thanks for the reply Vela! Actually I think I figured it out. Maybe you or someone else can check my work? I assumed that it the phi's were not typos, but they could very well be. I went ahead and attached my work.
 

Attachments

Your expressions for Ex and Ey are slightly wrong. For example,
E_x = A_x\cos(kz-\omega t+\phi_x) = A_x\cos(-r+\phi_x) = A_x\cos(r-\phi_x)since cosine is an even function. You have an extra negative signs floating around.

You must have made a mistake somewhere in the middle because the cross term has the wrong sign. The sign doesn't flip the way you did it because, again, \cos (-\theta)=\cos\theta.

You actually made it more complicated by keeping the E's and A's around. You know that
\begin{align*}
\frac{E_x}{A_x} &= \cos(\phi_x-r) \\
\frac{E_y}{A_y} &= \cos(r) \\
\end{align*}so you could have just written the lefthand side in terms of cosines and then shown it simplifies down to the righthand side.
 
Ah that I forgot about that cosine property and I found a convenient sign mistake half way through the problem. Thanks Vela!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top