Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the conversion of 2D part prints, including hand-drawn mechanical drawings, into 3D CAD models with Part Manufacturing Information (PMI). Participants explore the capabilities of various software and scanning technologies, as well as the challenges associated with raster and vector formats.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about software that can convert 2D part prints to 3D CAD models with PMI.
- Another participant notes that major CAD suppliers have had the ability to import PDFs of 2D drawings and convert them to 3D CAD models since 2013.
- Further discussion reveals that scanning mechanical drawings at locations like FedEx results in raster formats, which are not compatible with CAD software that typically uses vector formats.
- One participant questions the existence of scanners that can directly produce vector formats, expressing skepticism about the feasibility of such technology.
- Another participant outlines a detailed process for converting raster images to vector formats, emphasizing the need for specific input and accuracy checks during the conversion.
- A participant mentions the potential for using inexpensive laser scanners to digitize parts, while expressing uncertainty about whether PMI information would be retained in the process.
- Some participants suggest using software like Inkscape for vectorizing images and FreeCAD for creating 3D models.
- Discussion includes the importance of converting legacy part prints to CAD for efficiency in manufacturing and inspection processes.
- Participants highlight that many CAD programs can import and convert 2D to 3D models, provided the original files are in vector format.
- Several online services are mentioned as options for converting part prints to CAD if internal resources are limited.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of views on the capabilities of existing software and scanning technologies, with no consensus on the best approach to convert raster images to vector formats or the effectiveness of various methods discussed.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the dependence on the quality of raster scans, the need for specific input for vectorization, and the unresolved nature of the accuracy of conversion methods. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with software tools and processes among participants.
Who May Find This Useful
This discussion may be useful for professionals in manufacturing, engineering, and design who are looking to digitize legacy part prints and integrate them into modern CAD workflows.