Partial Differential Equation in Special Relativity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the wave equation for light waves in the context of special relativity, specifically examining the implications of changing coordinates from \( (x, t) \) to \( (x', t') \). Participants are tasked with showing how derivatives transform under this change and deducing the consequences for the wave equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transformation of derivatives using the chain rule and how to express the wave equation in the new coordinates. There are attempts to clarify the implications of the transformation on the validity of the wave equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made attempts to derive expressions for the second derivatives in the new coordinates and are exploring whether the wave equation holds in those coordinates. There is a mix of requests for guidance and clarifications on how to approach the deduction conceptually and mathematically.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of partial derivatives and the implications of coordinate transformations in the context of special relativity. There is a noted uncertainty regarding the mathematical deduction of the wave equation's validity in the transformed coordinates.

Nerrad
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(a) Light waves satisfy the wave equation ##u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx}## where ##c## is the speed of light.
Consider change of coordinates $$x'=x-Vt$$ $$t'=t$$
where V is a constant. Use the chain rule to show that ##u_x=u_{x'}## and ##u_{tt}=-Vu_{x'}+u_{t'}##
Find ##u_{xx},u_{tt},## and hence ##u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx}##, in terms of derivatives with respect to ##x'## and ##t'##.
Deduce that if ##u## satisfies the wave equation in ##x,t## coordinates, then it does not satisfy the same equation in the ##x',t'## coordinates.

The Attempt at a Solution


So I've worked out that $$u_{xx}=u_{x'x'}$$ and $$u_{tt}=u_{t't'}+v^2(u_{x'x'})-2v(u_{x'xt})$$ so technically ##u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx}## expressed in terms of derivatives with respect to ##x'## and ##t'## would just be $$u_{t't'}+v^2(u_{x'x'})-2v(u_{x'xt})-c^2(u_{x'x'})=0$$ right?
But how do I do the bit where question says "Deduce that if ##u## satisfies the wave equation in ##x,t## coordinates, then it does not satisfy the same equation in the ##x',t'## coordinates." I don't know where to start with this?Would this be done conceptually or mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nerrad said:
I don't know where to start with this?
Start with the wave equation.
 
kuruman said:
Start with the wave equation.
Can you give a little bit more hints than that please? Thanks
 
I give up. Can you guide me through this. Please. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Is it simply due to the fact that ##u_{xx}-c^2u_{tt} \neq u_{x'x'}-c^2u_{t't'} ##, so that if ##u## satisfies the wave equation in ##x##,##t## coordinates, then it does not satisfy the same equation in the ##x'##,##t'## coordinates? Or do I deduce it mathematically?
 
If you calculate ##u_{xx}-c^2u_{tt}## and ##u_{x'x'}-c^2u_{t't'}## and it turns out that the two expressions are not equal, then you have "deduced it mathematically."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nerrad

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K