Partial differentiation and partial derivatives

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the partial derivatives \(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\), \(\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}\), \(\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}\), and \(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t}\) for the equations \(xs^2 + yt^2 = 1\) and \(x^2s + y^2t = xy - 4\) at the point \((x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss taking differentials of the given equations and applying Cramer's Rule to solve for the derivatives. There is also mention of substituting numerical values into the equations to simplify the process.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion about the approach taken, while others suggest a more direct method of differentiating the equations. There is acknowledgment of a specific answer for \(\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}\), but the discussion remains focused on the process rather than confirming the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the equations and the potential for nonlinear relationships, emphasizing the importance of the numerical values provided for simplification.

Tabiri
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If ##xs^2 + yt^2 = 1## (1) and ##x^2s + y^2t = xy - 4,## (2) find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}## at ##(x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)##.

Homework Equations



Pretty much those just listed above.

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright so I spent quite a while on this one. First of all, I took the differentials of both the equations, (1) and (2), and came up with $$s^2\,dx + 2sx\,ds + t^2\,dy + 2ty\,dt = 0 $$ for (1) and $$ 2xs\,dx + x^2\,ds + 2yt\,dy + y^2\,dt = y\,dx + x\,dy$$ for (2).

Then, substituting in ##(x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)## for the respective variables I came up with $$4\,dx + 4\,ds + \,dy + 6\,dt = 0 $$ for (1) and $$4\,dx + \,ds + 6\,dy + 9\,dt = -3\,dx + \,dy$$ for (2).

Simplifying and moving things around a bit, I got $$ 4\,dx + 4\,ds = -\,dy - 6\,dt $$ for (1) and $$ 7\,dx + \,ds = -5\,dy - 9\,dt $$ for (2).

Then I used Cramer's Rule to solve these two equations for ##\,dx## and ##\,ds.##. For ##\,dx## I got $$ \,dx = \frac{
\begin{vmatrix}
-\,dy - 6\,dt & 4 \\
-5\,dy - 9\,dt & 1
\end{vmatrix}
}{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 4 \\
7 & 1
\end{vmatrix}
}

= \frac{-\,dy - 6\,dt + 4(5\,dy + 9\,dt)}{-24} = \frac{-\,dy - 6\,dt + 20\,dy + 36\,dt}{-24} = \frac{19\,dy + 30\,dt}{-24} = \frac{-19\,dy - 30\,dt}{24}$$

$$ \,ds = \frac{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & -\,dy - 6\,dt \\
7 & -5\,dy - 9\,dt
\end{vmatrix}
}{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 4 \\
7 & 1
\end{vmatrix}
} = \frac{4(-5\,dy - 9\,dt) + 7(\,dy + 6\,dt)}{-24} = \frac{-20\,dy - 36\,dt + 7\,dy + 42\,dt}{-24} = \frac{-13\,dy + 6\,dt}{-24} = \frac{13\,dy - 6\,dt}{24}.
$$

Then I changed the equations around to $$\,dy + 6\,dt = -4\,dx - 4\,ds$$ for (1) and $$5\,dy + 9\,dt = -7\,dx - \,ds$$ for (2). Using Cramer's Rule again to solve for ##\,dy## and ##\,dt## I got
$$\,dy = \frac{-6\,dx + 30\,ds}{21}$$
$$\,dt = \frac{-13\,dx - 19\,ds}{21}.$$

Then I wanted to find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}##, so I took what I got for ##\,dy## and ##\,dt## plugged it into (1), ##4\,dx + 4\,ds + \,dy + 6\,dt = 0,## and got $$4\,dx + 4\,ds + \frac{-6\,dx + 30\,ds}{21} + 6(\frac{-13\,dx - 19\,ds}{21}) = 0.$$ Multiplying this all out, everything just cancels to zero and I can't find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}##. I've checked the math for the applications of Cramer's Rule and can't find anything wrong there, so... what am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tabiri said:

Homework Statement



If ##xs^2 + yt^2 = 1## (1) and ##x^2s + y^2t = xy - 4,## (2) find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}## at ##(x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)##.



Homework Equations



Pretty much those just listed above.



The Attempt at a Solution



Alright so I spent quite a while on this one. First of all, I took the differentials of both the equations, (1) and (2), and came up with $$s^2\,dx + 2sx\,ds + t^2\,dy + 2ty\,dt = 0 $$ for (1) and $$ 2xs\,dx + x^2\,ds + 2yt\,dy + y^2\,dt = y\,dx + x\,dy$$ for (2).

Then, substituting in ##(x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)## for the respective variables I came up with $$4\,dx + 4\,ds + \,dy + 6\,dt = 0 $$ for (1) and $$4\,dx + \,ds + 6\,dy + 9\,dt = -3\,dx + \,dy$$ for (2).

Simplifying and moving things around a bit, I got $$ 4\,dx + 4\,ds = -\,dy - 6\,dt $$ for (1) and $$ 7\,dx + \,ds = -5\,dy - 9\,dt $$ for (2).

Then I used Cramer's Rule to solve these two equations for ##\,dx## and ##\,ds.##. For ##\,dx## I got $$ \,dx = \frac{
\begin{vmatrix}
-\,dy - 6\,dt & 4 \\
-5\,dy - 9\,dt & 1
\end{vmatrix}
}{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 4 \\
7 & 1
\end{vmatrix}
}

= \frac{-\,dy - 6\,dt + 4(5\,dy + 9\,dt)}{-24} = \frac{-\,dy - 6\,dt + 20\,dy + 36\,dt}{-24} = \frac{19\,dy + 30\,dt}{-24} = \frac{-19\,dy - 30\,dt}{24}$$

$$ \,ds = \frac{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & -\,dy - 6\,dt \\
7 & -5\,dy - 9\,dt
\end{vmatrix}
}{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 4 \\
7 & 1
\end{vmatrix}
} = \frac{4(-5\,dy - 9\,dt) + 7(\,dy + 6\,dt)}{-24} = \frac{-20\,dy - 36\,dt + 7\,dy + 42\,dt}{-24} = \frac{-13\,dy + 6\,dt}{-24} = \frac{13\,dy - 6\,dt}{24}.
$$

Then I changed the equations around to $$\,dy + 6\,dt = -4\,dx - 4\,ds$$ for (1) and $$5\,dy + 9\,dt = -7\,dx - \,ds$$ for (2). Using Cramer's Rule again to solve for ##\,dy## and ##\,dt## I got
$$\,dy = \frac{-6\,dx + 30\,ds}{21}$$
$$\,dt = \frac{-13\,dx - 19\,ds}{21}.$$

Then I wanted to find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}##, so I took what I got for ##\,dy## and ##\,dt## plugged it into (1), ##4\,dx + 4\,ds + \,dy + 6\,dt = 0,## and got $$4\,dx + 4\,ds + \frac{-6\,dx + 30\,ds}{21} + 6(\frac{-13\,dx - 19\,ds}{21}) = 0.$$ Multiplying this all out, everything just cancels to zero and I can't find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}##. I've checked the math for the applications of Cramer's Rule and can't find anything wrong there, so... what am I doing wrong?

I cannot understand what you are trying to do, or why you want to do it. The easiest way is just to differentiate directly. Letting ##x_s = \partial x/\partial s##, etc, we have:
(1) \Longrightarrow s^2 x_s + 2 s x + t^2 y_s = 0 \\<br /> (2) \Longrightarrow x^2 + 2 s x x_s + 2 t y y_s = x y_s + y x_s<br />
which you can solve for ##x_s,y_s##. It is much easier if you first substitute in the numerical values of ##x,y,s,t##.
 
As in solve for ##y_s## in (1) and then plug that value for ##y_s## into (2)?

Edit: Also, I know that the answer for ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}## is ##\frac{-19}{13}##
 
Tabiri said:
As in solve for ##y_s## in (1) and then plug that value for ##y_s## into (2)?

Edit: Also, I know that the answer for ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}## is ##\frac{-19}{13}##

You have two equations in the two unknowns ##x_s, y_s##, and these equations are linear in these unknowns. They happen to be nonlinear in ##s,t,x,y##, but that does not matter, since we are already given numerical values for them. The things we don't know are ##x_s, y_s## and ##x_t,y_t##.
 
Yeah, I just did it that way and got the right answer. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K