Partial Pressure Calculation for Argon Gas Collected Over Water at 30.0oC

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the number of moles of argon gas collected over water at 30.0°C, the total pressure of 771 torr is adjusted for the vapor pressure of water at 31.8 torr, resulting in a partial pressure of argon of approximately 739.2 torr. This leads to the calculation of moles of argon, yielding 9.78e-3 mol. The partial pressure of argon is converted to atmospheres, resulting in approximately 0.973 atm. However, the total mass of gas cannot be expressed in atmospheres, indicating an error in the initial mass calculation. Accurate mass determination requires converting moles of argon to grams using its molar mass.
chem31sa6
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A sample of argon gas is collected over water at 30.0oC. The level of the
water is adjusted until the total pressure in the flask is 771 torr and the volume is 250.0
mL. The vapor pressure of water is 31.8 torr at 30.0oC.

A. How many moles of argon are in the flask?
B. What is the partial pressure of argon in the flask?
C. What is the total mass of gas in the flask?

I got:
a) 9.78e-3 mol
b) .973atm
c) 1.946 atm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And?

c is definitely wrong - mass is not measured in atm.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top