Particle disintegration problem from Landafshitz

  • Thread starter Thread starter Geofleur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging problem from Landau and Lifgarbagez's Mechanics regarding the disintegration of a particle at rest into two particles and determining the angle θ between them in the lab frame. The user initially struggles with deriving the correct relationship between the angles in the center of mass and lab frames, particularly with the tangent formulas. After calculating the derivative and attempting to express the answer in terms of cos θ0, confusion arises due to discrepancies with the book's solution, which uses sin θ0. Ultimately, the user realizes that an error in their diagram led to the misunderstanding, highlighting the importance of accurate visual representation in solving physics problems. This experience emphasizes the complexities involved in particle dynamics and the necessity of careful diagramming in theoretical physics.
Geofleur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
426
Reaction score
177
I've been stuck on problem 3 from Ch. 4 of Landau and Lifgarbagez's Mechanics for more than a week now. It's not a homework problem - I'm working through Landau and Lifgarbagez on my own.

A particle at rest disintegrates into two, and the problem is to find the range of values that the angle θ between the resulting particles can take, where θ is measured from the lab system.

There are formulas that give tan(θ1) and tan(θ2) in terms of the angle θ0 of particle 1 with respect to the x-axis in the center of mass frame, and θ1,2 are the angles that particles 1,2 make with the x-axis in the lab frame.

The separation angle is thus θ = θ1+θ2 and I calculate the tangent of this angle by using the formula tan(θ1+θ2) = (tan θ1 + tan θ2)/(1 - tan θ1 tan θ2). Taking the derivative of this expression, setting the result to zero, and solving for θ0 gives me an answer in terms of cos θ0, but the answer in the book is in terms of sin θ0; trying to use cos θ0 = √(1 - sin θ0) does not help at all!

Is there anyone here that has worked this problem and knows where their answer comes from? Or maybe a different tack to try?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found the problem. My diagram was wrong, so that I was using pi minus the angle I really needed in one place! How embarrassing...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top