Particle in a potential well of harmonic oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to a particle in a potential well of a harmonic oscillator. The user references a previous solution and presents their own wave packet formulation, questioning the validity of their approach for t > 0. They seek clarification on how to derive the coefficients for the superposition of eigenstates based on initial conditions. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the energy states of the harmonic oscillator and the application of the Schrödinger equation. Overall, the exchange emphasizes the need for a deeper grasp of quantum mechanics concepts to solve the problem effectively.
Roodles01
Messages
125
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a similar problem to this one on Physicsforum from a few years ago.


Homework Equations


Cleggy has finished part a) saying he gets the answer as
Ψ(x, t) = (1/√2) (ψ1(x)exp(-3iwt/2+ iψ3(x)exp(-7iwt/2)

OK
classical angular frequency ω0 = √C/m for period of oscillation T = 2∏ / ω0
I note that E0 = ½ ħ ω0




The Attempt at a Solution


I have, for a wave packet with equal coefficients for 1st & 2nd stationary state wave function;
ψA(x,t) = 1/√2 (ψ0(x) e-iwt/2 + ψ1(x) e-3iwt/2)

This question asks for vaidity for t>0

I don't get how he got there.
Could someone expand this please
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose \psi_n(x,t) are the eigenstates with energy E_n.

Then a generic state (general solution of the Schrodinger equation) can be written as the superposition of these states:

\psi(x,t)=\sum_{n}a_n\psi_n(x,t)=\sum_{n}a_n\psi_n(x)e^{-iE_n t/\hbar}

Now match this with the initial condition to find the coefficients a_n and use the energy states for the harmonic oscillator:

E_n=\hbar\omega\left(n+\frac12\right)
 
Ah! Yes, I hadn't done reading ahead enough, so hadn't got to that bit.
Thanks for the pointer, though.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top