Particle movement in a non-static magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
Particles in a non-static magnetic field are governed by the equation m*a = q*E + q*v x B, with variations in current affecting secondary coils. The user attempts to apply magnetic flux conservation similar to transformers but finds it inadequate for calculating individual particle movement. They propose using a modified Lorentz force equation for a loop, accounting for the time-varying magnetic field, resulting in E = -0.5*r*(dB/dt). This approach is valid for slowly varying magnetic fields, as particles follow a helical path rather than a circular one. The discussion concludes with the acknowledgment that the user will not return to the forum.
Javier Lopez
Messages
74
Reaction score
3
Particles follows accordingly the general equation:

$$
m*\overrightarrow{a}=q*\overrightarrow{E}+q*\overrightarrow{v}\wedge \overrightarrow{B}
$$

But in the case of two coupled coils the time varying current at primary coil (and its magnetic field variation) creates corresponding varying current in the secondary coil

To calculate it I use the magnetic flux conservation like in transforrmers where the plasma is the secondary coil but it does not work well to calculate the movement of each particle

Then, what formula is better to use to calculate the particle movement?

Accordingly Lorentz applied to a loop (where the ion describes a circled current):
$$
Fem=\oint \overrightarrow{E}\overrightarrow{dl}=-\frac{d\overrightarrow{\phi }}{dt}\\\\
2\pi r*\overrightarrow{E}=-\pi r^2*\frac{d\overrightarrow{B}}{dt}\\\\
\overrightarrow{E}=-0.5*r*\frac{d\overrightarrow{B}}{dt}
$$
So:
$$
m*\overrightarrow{a}=q*\overrightarrow{E}+q*\overrightarrow{v}\wedge \overrightarrow{B} - \frac{1}{2}*q*r* \frac{d\overrightarrow{B}}{dt}
$$

Where r is the Cyclotron radius. That is only true for slow varying magnetc fields because the ion does not describes a circle but an helix

Is it correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fun question, but unfortunately, for other reasons this user will not be returning to the PF. Thread is closed.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top