When is the Particle at Equilibrium Position?

AI Thread Summary
The equilibrium position of the particle described by the function x(t) = 5 cos(3t + 2) occurs when x(t) = 0. This leads to the equation 3t + 2 = (π/2) + πn, where n is an integer, indicating multiple times the particle is at equilibrium. A negative time solution, such as t = -0.14s, signifies that the particle was at equilibrium 0.14 seconds before t = 0, which is not relevant for practical scenarios. In real-life applications, only positive time values are considered meaningful, as the motion begins at t = 0. Understanding this concept clarifies the interpretation of negative solutions in oscillatory motion.
Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Position of particle is given by:
x(t) = 5 cos (3t +2)

At what time after t = 0 is the particle at the equilibrium position?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I understand the equilibrium position to be the point where x(t) = 0 since x(t) is thedisplacement from the equilibrium position is it not? But when i re-arrange for t, i get t = -0.14s, negative? Just doesn't seem right what am I doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember, the cosine function has an infinite number of 0s and your oscillator returns to the equilibrium position an infinite number of times (assuming it never slows down). Your function is at equilibrium whenever 3t + 2 = {{\pi}\over{2}} + \pi n where n = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, \pm 3.... Each of these values of n gives you a different time where the particle will be at equilibrium. The meaning of a negative answer is simply that .14s in the past, it was at equilibrium.

When you get "realistic" about the problem in real life, however, you simply say that particle begins motion at t = 0 and you don't care about negative times. In fact, if you recall basic kinematics problems with cannons and all that good stuff, you would have had the same problem. Say you dropped a ball off a cliff and wanted to know at what time it would have reached a certain height. The math would tell you that there are 2 times where the ball would have reached that height, one being negative. You start the experiment at t = 0, though, so negative answers are unphysical or uninteresting to you at the least.
 
Omg so obvious when you see it layed out infront of you, thanks a lot for the help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top