Particle Trajectory & Velocity in Bubble Chamber vs HUP

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eoghan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bubble Chamber Hup
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of measuring particle trajectories and velocities in a bubble chamber in relation to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP). Participants explore the apparent contradiction between precise measurements of particle motion and the uncertainty principles governing quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that measuring the trajectory and velocity of a particle in a bubble chamber contradicts the HUP, questioning where their reasoning might be flawed.
  • Another participant counters that the initial claim is incorrect because the measurements occur at different times, suggesting that the HUP pertains to non-commuting observables.
  • A participant emphasizes that the uncertainty remains even when measurements are taken at different times, indicating a common misunderstanding of the HUP.
  • One participant provides a practical example, noting that fast particles travel quickly through a bubble chamber, which may affect the timing of bubble formation and measurements.
  • Another participant discusses the ability to measure position and momentum at different times, questioning the applicability of these measurements in a bubble chamber context.
  • A later reply references Feynman's lectures, suggesting that while one can know the past accurately, it does not equate to being able to predict it, highlighting a distinction in understanding the implications of the HUP.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between measurements in a bubble chamber and the HUP. There is no consensus on the implications of these measurements, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of the HUP in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the timing of measurements and the implications of the HUP, but do not resolve these issues. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of quantum mechanics principles.

eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi! Let's say I have a bubble chamber and a particle traveling in it. I know the trajectory of the particle, because I can see the bubbles. But if I measure the time elapsed between the appearance of the first bubble and of the last one, I know how much time the particle took to follow the trajectory. So I can know exactly particle's trajectory and particle velocity, but this is in contradiction with HUP... so, where am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are wrong because first you do not have a bubble chamber.
 
Last edited:
eoghan said:
Hi! Let's say I have a bubble chamber and a particle traveling in it. I know the trajectory of the particle, because I can see the bubbles. But if I measure the time elapsed between the appearance of the first bubble and of the last one, I know how much time the particle took to follow the trajectory. So I can know exactly particle's trajectory and particle velocity, but this is in contradiction with HUP... so, where am I wrong?

Well, this one is way off because you are measuring things at 2 different points in time. The HUP relates to knowing non-commuting observables simultaneously. The information you gained from measuring at T1 is no longer relevant after the measurement at T2.
 
DrChinese said:
Well, this one is way off because you are measuring things at 2 different points in time. The HUP relates to knowing non-commuting observables simultaneously. The information you gained from measuring at T1 is no longer relevant after the measurement at T2.

It is a common misunderstanding. The uncertainty remains even if you take the delta_x and delta_p at different times.
 
A fast particle travels about 30 cm per nanosecond, so will (did, actually) travel across the largest bubble chamber in about 10 or 15 nanoseconds. Visible bubble formation takes several milliseconds after the piston moves and the pressure on the hydrogen (or other liquid) is reduced to initiate bubble formation.
Bob S
 
Last edited:
Bob_for_short said:
It is a common misunderstanding. The uncertainty remains even if you take the delta_x and delta_p at different times.

Not sure I follow your thinking here. You can measure delta_x to any degree of accuracy at T1, and then measure delta_q to any degree of accuracy at T2. Maybe not in a bubble chamber though.
 
I think you are talking past each other.

As Feynman pointed out in his lectures the HUP is about what we are able to predict. If we have a Gaussian wavepacket there is of course some uncertainty about predicting \Delta x and \Delta p at different times. However nothing will keeping us from backtracking for example by putting a position detector behind a long slit (assuring that the vertical momentum equals 0). You know the past pretty exactly, but you were not able to predict it.
 
Cthugha said:
You know the past pretty exactly, but you were not able to predict it.
Knowing the past is even better than predicting.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K