Partition function for a gas in a cylinder -

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the partition function for an ideal gas in a cylindrical container under the influence of gravity. The original poster presents a problem that involves deriving expressions for the partition function of a single particle and the total partition function for multiple particles, as well as exploring the Helmholtz free energy in a classical context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which the partition function can be factored and the significance of gravitational potential energy in the context of the problem. There are attempts to derive the single particle partition function using integrals and density functions, with some questioning the necessity of certain components in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided calculations and expressed uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to derive the partition function, with some participants suggesting the use of spherical coordinates and density functions. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the mathematical framework required for the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to consider the indistinguishability of particles and the implications of using a density function in their calculations. There is mention of specific constraints related to the problem setup, such as the gravitational field and the classical treatment of the gas.

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Partition function for a gas in a cylinder -- urgent!

Hi,

Here's the problem -- it's supposed to be a specimen of what I can expect in my exam, but it isn't much like the tutorial questions I've been doing. I'd really appreciate some help -- fast!

Homework Statement



An ideal gas consisting of N particles of mass m is enclosed in an infinitely-tall cylindrical container of cross-section area A placed vertically in a uniform gravitational field with gravitational acceleration g. The conditions are such that the problem can be treated classically, and the system is in equilibrium at a temperature T.

a) Explain under what circumstances the partition function of a gas can be factored into single particle partition functions.
(b) Obtain an expression for the partition function for a single particle in the cylinder.
(c) Obtain an expression for the total partition function for all gas particles in the cylinder.
(d) Derive the Helmholtz free energy for the gas

The Attempt at a Solution



Clearly g is supposed to be important here. But I would have thought the energy of a single particle could be written

E = p_{i}^2 / 2m

Then, for a single particle,

Z_{c}_{sp} = \sum_{i} e^{-\beta\epsilon_{i}} = Z_{c}_{sp} = \sum_{i} e^{-\beta p_{i}^2/2m}

Then, since \epsilon_{i} can take a large number of values, approximate the sum by an integral:

Z_{c}^{sp} = \int \rho(p) dp e^{-\beta p_{i}^2/2m}

I'll need to derive a density function (presumably the usual 3D one derived in the first octant of a sphere is inappropriate... though the system is surely still 3D).

I would then form the total partition function by raising the single one to the power N and dividing by N! to compensate for the indistinguishability of particles.

However, my partition function is almost certainly wrong... do I just add mgh to it, and if so, how do I compute the partition function integral?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
T-7 said:
Then, since \epsilon_{i} can take a large number of values, approximate the sum by an integral:

Z_{c}^{sp} = \int \rho(p) dp e^{-\beta p_{i}^2/2m}

I'll need to derive a density function (presumably the usual 3D one derived in the first octant of a sphere is inappropriate... though the system is surely still 3D).

I don't know why you need a density function or a single particle. The energy of the particle is

E=\frac{p^2}{2\,m}+m\,g\,z

thus

Z_{c}^{sp} = \int e^{ \frac{-\beta\,p^2}{2\,m}}\,d^3\,p \int e^{ -\beta\,m\,g\,z}\,d^3\,x

For the first integral, with the aid of shperical coordinates we have

I_1=\sqrt{8\,\pi^3\,m^3}\,\beta^{-3/2}

while the 2nd one yields

I_2=\frac{A}{\beta\,m\,g}

Finally
Z_{c}^{sp} =\sqrt{\frac{8\,A^2\,\pi^3\,m}{g^2}}\,\beta^{-5/2}

if my calculations are correct! :smile:
 
Last edited:
Rainbow Child said:
I don't know why you need a density function or a single particle. The energy of the particle is

E=\frac{p^2}{2\,m}+m\,g\,z

thus

Z_{c}^{sp} = \int e^{ \frac{-\beta\,p^2}{2\,m}}\,d^3\,p \int e^{ -\beta\,m\,g\,z}\,d^3\,x

For the first integral, with the aid of shperical coordinates we have

I_1=\sqrt{8\,\pi^3\,m^3}\,\beta^{-3/2}

while the 2nd one yields

I_2=\frac{A}{\beta\,m\,g}

Finally
Z_{c}^{sp} =\sqrt{\frac{8\,A^2\,\pi^3\,m}{g^2}}\,\beta^{-5/2}

if my calculations are correct! :smile:

Thanks for your reply :-)

I believe we are supposed to use a density function, however -- at least, it says later in the question to show that

F \approx NkT log \left(\frac{AkT}{Nh^{3}mg}(2\pi mkT)^{3/2}\right)

h is Plank's constant.

This *looks* to me like an expression has been derived for the k-density, turned into a p-density (p = \hbar k ) and introduced somewhere down the line.
 
Last edited:
If you need to use a density function then the first integral I_1 is to be evaluated for the magnititude of the momentum.
So the number of the states in the interval (p,d\,p) is

g(p)\,d\,p=\frac{4\,\pi\,p^2\,V}{h^3}\,d\,p

i.e., the density function you mentioned in the 1st post.
 
how would you obtain the total partition function for this question?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K