Partition function for ideal gas for "medium" temperature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the heat capacity of an ideal gas related to its rotational degrees of freedom. It explains that at high temperatures, the partition function can be approximated using an integral over the density of states, while at low temperatures, higher terms can be neglected. When temperatures are close to each other, particularly near the rotational temperature, it is suggested that only the first few terms of the partition function need to be summed. The rapid decrease in values when evaluating terms around the rotational temperature is emphasized. Understanding these temperature relationships is crucial for accurately calculating the heat capacity of the gas.
rockyleg
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Looking for the heat capacity of ideal gas due to rotational degrees of freedom.
If the temperature of the gas is much higher than the temperature corresponding to the energy differential between states,the partition function can be written as the integral over the density of states.
If the temperature is much smaller,then the higher terms of the partition function can be ignored.
Is there a usual method for when the two temperatures are close to each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rockyleg said:
If the temperature is much smaller,then the higher terms of the partition function can be ignored.
Is there a usual method for when the two temperatures are close to each other?
Actually, when the temperature is much smaller, then only the ground state is significantly populated. It is when the temperature is close to the rotational temperature (rotational constant divided by kB) that you can sum the first few terms.

You should try it out: consider that the temperature is approximately equal to the rotational temperature and see how many terms you need to consider in the partition function. You will see that the values decrease very fast.
 
  • Like
Likes rockyleg
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top