PASCO lab on the interferometer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem encountered during the PASCO lab on interferometers, specifically in Experiment 3, which involves measuring the index of refraction of a laser using a glass plate. The user faced issues with fringe transitions appearing to move in opposite directions when adjusting the angle of the glass plate. A suggestion was made that the initial positioning of the glass plate might not have been perfectly perpendicular, affecting the results. By adjusting the reference angle to 2 degrees instead of 0 degrees, the user found that this approach yielded a more accurate index of refraction. The conversation highlights the importance of precise alignment in optical experiments.
big man
Messages
241
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I did the PASCO lab on the interferometer the other day and just have a problem that I wouldn't mind knowing what caused it.

here is the link to the PASCO lab manual:
http://www.nhn.ou.edu/~johnson/Education/Juniorlab/Optics/Pasco_Interferometers.pdf

Just in case you want to see what we had to do.

Anyway the problem occurred in Experiment 3 in that lab manual.
We had to measure the index of refraction of a laser by placing a glass plate in the arrangement given in the above manual.
Now I did that and tried to make it so that the glass plate was as perpendicular to the laser as I could make it, so as to reduce the effect of the secondary interference pattern. But I still had a very distinct pattern that made it hard to count the number of fringe transitions with varying the angle of the glass plate.

Now the problem is that when I started changing the angle of the glass plate, the fringe transitions were appearing to go to the left, but then when I had moved it maybe 2 degrees the fringe transitions momentarily stopped and then continued, but this time they were 'moving' in the opposite direction. It continued moving in the opposite direction (right) from 2 degrees to the end limit (10 degrees). I asked another group if that happened to them and they said it hadn't so I was just wondering if any of you guys knew what might cause something like that to happen?

I'd appreciate any ideas that I could further look into.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd be willing to bet that when you started with your glass plate, you weren't precisely perpendicular but were a little too far on the far side. In other words, you were probably perpendicular when you got to 2 degrees.

Try using 2 degrees as your "zero" instead of 0 degrees. If you do this, do you get the correct index of refraction for the glass?

Carl
 
ahhh ok...that does work out to a better value.

Thanks for that : )
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top