Path Equation for 2D weakly-anisotropic harmonic oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the path equation for a 2D weakly-anisotropic harmonic oscillator defined by two angular frequencies, ω_x and ω_y, with ω_y slightly greater than ω_x. The user attempts to derive the relationship between x(t) and y(t) by substituting t(x) into y(t), resulting in a complex equation. They express difficulty in simplifying this equation and consider using double-angle trigonometric identities but remain uncertain about their application. The user seeks guidance on further manipulation of the equation to achieve a more recognizable form. The conversation highlights the mathematical challenges involved in solving the problem.
lightbearer88
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


\omega_{x} = \omega

\omega_{y} = \omega + \epsilon

where 0 < \epsilon<<\omega

Question: Find the path equation.

Homework Equations



I started with the 2D equations:

x(t) = A_{x}cos(\omega_{x}t + \phi_{x})
y(t) = A_{y}cos(\omega_{y}t + \phi_{y})

The Attempt at a Solution



by inverting x(t) to get t(x), I then substituted the result into y(t). The result is as below:

y(x) = A_{y}cos[(\omega_{x}/\omega_{y})cos^{-1}(x/A_{x}) - (\omega_{x}/\omega_{y})\phi_{x} + \phi_{y}]

I guess it becomes more of a mathematical problem. How do I simplify this equation, hopefully to find something familiar? An idea I had was to use double-angle trig formulas but I am not sure how it would help.

I personally think this is quite challenging. I have been thinking about it for days now. I tried all the trig identities I know off to manipulate the equation but I can't seem to get it. Unless I am missing something.

Thanks in advance.

PS: A^x is actually A(subscript)x and similarly, A^y is actually A(subscript)y. I don't know what is wrong with the formatting.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
maybe I should define what the symbols are:

\omega_{x} is the angular frequency in the x-axis
\omega_{y} is the angular frequency in the y-axis
 
I'd try to substitute the \omega you have and then try to expand it by small parameter \epsilon...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top