PDE Charactersitic equations colliding and shocks concepts

  • Thread starter Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concepts Pde
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

I'm new to shocks and trying to get the hang of it.
I have 3 sets of characteristic equations,( by a set I mean defined by taking a different fixed value u along the characteristic.)

From what I understand,in general talk, we use a shock whenever two sets of characteristics collide as otherwise u=u(x,t) would be multi-valued:

*The shock - x(t)- begins at the first collision , and the collision point acts as the initial condition for the shock curve. The shock curve remains given by the same equation until there is a change in characteristic equation to the right of the shock curve. When this occurs the new shock curve is computed subject to the u+- limits at this point where the change occurs, and this point now acting as the initial condition...

Questions:

For Burgers equation subject to u(x,0) = 1 for x<0, 1-x for 0<x<1, 0 for x>1.

1) For this initial data, all curves meet at (1,1). Which set of the characteristic equations do we then treat as colliding - in attaining u+ and u-( Am I correct in thinking that u+ has to be given by u=0. but for u- don't we have a choice between u=1 and u=1-x ?)

2) The set of characteristics between 0<s<1 converge to (1,1) and then diverge from it. Am I correct in thinking that nothing needs to be dealt with here? I.e- self-crossing characteristics is not a issue because there is no problem with u being multi-valued.

3) For these initial conditions , I'm struggling to apply * - to the right of (1,1) . For example if I attain my shock curve at (1,1) by using u+=0 and 'choosing' u-= 1 i get the shock curve t=2x-1. This lies exactly on the characteristic given by s=1/2. That is it leaves half of this set to the left of it, so they are dealt with it. But half to right. So to the right we have these and the vertical lines given by u=0. From what I can make out at exactly (1,1) the initial condition is correct, but as soon as I begin to 'travel' along the shock t=2x-1, I can not interpret whether the change to the right of the curve is due to the line u=x-1 or u=0 (since by varying s continuously we can make either set of characteristics arbitrarily close to the shock curve). Thanks in advance for any assistance , extremely appreciated !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump. please. your assistance is greatly appreciated.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
96
Views
4K
Back
Top