Pendulum Damping force effect on amplitude over time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in amplitude of a pendulum influenced by a damping force due to air friction. The pendulum has an initial amplitude of 1.4 m, a 15 m massless wire, and a 110 kg brass bob, with a damping force of 0.010 kg/s. The damping force is velocity-dependent and modeled as Fair(t) = -k * v(t), where k is a constant. A suggestion is made to use Laplace transforms to derive a position function, which can then be inverted to find the position over time. This approach aims to provide a more accurate representation of the pendulum's motion and amplitude decay.
Dreshawn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am struggling with setting up a problem to solve for the change in amplitude of a pendulum affected by a damping force (presumable air friction) over a time period.
The original amplitude of the pendulum is 1.4 m from the equilibrium on a 15 m massless wire with a 110 kg brass bob at the end. The damping force is 0.010 kg/s. This force is dependent on velocity and I have set up an equation for velocity dependent on time -
dv/dt = -ωAsin(ωt+Φ0). I know that this force will always oppose motion but I am having trouble putting these together to see the affect on the pendulum bob's acceleration and amplitude. I was wondering if I should just use the pendulums max velocity at the bottom to approximate this damping force & then apply this to the # of oscillations to get a rough estimate on the decrease of acceleration at the bottom & then solve for amplitude or if there is another more accurate way to solve this problem.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dreshawn said:
The damping force is 0.010 kg/s.

The damping force is not constant: Fair(t) = -k * v(t), (assuming laminar airflow). k is a constant.

If you are able to, then setup a model using Laplace transform. You will get a position output from the model in the form:

Y(s) = A / (s2 + Bs + C) that can be rewritten:

Y(s) = A / (s2 + 2ζωns + ωn2), ξ = damping ratio, ωn = resonance frequency [rad/s].

The inverse transform of Y(s) will give you position(t).

post-1379-0-41542500-1345410496.jpg
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top