Pendulum Rise from Release Point: 0.005 m

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating how high a pendulum rises after being released from a 30° angle with an initial speed of 0.39 m/s. The original poster attempted to use conservation of energy principles but encountered errors in their calculations, particularly with the use of kinetic energy formulas. Other participants pointed out that the mass can be canceled out and suggested simplifying the approach by directly equating initial kinetic energy to potential energy at the highest point. They also noted potential sources of error, including confusion between radians and degrees, and the correct application of the arccosine function. The poster remains uncertain about their calculations despite receiving feedback.
386221
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are given a pendulum composed of a 0.030 kg mass on the end of a 0.60 m long massless string. If the pendulum is moved 30° from the vertical and given an initial speed of 0.39 m/s tangent to the support string and away from the vertical, how much higher relative to the release point of the pendulum swing will the pendulum rise?


Homework Equations


KE=1/2mv^2
PE=mgL(1-cosθ)


The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I did. I found the velocity at the bottom of the swing.
1/2vf^2 = 1/2vi^2 + mgL(1-cosθ)
and I got vf= 1.3 m/s
Then I did the same thing again, except I set vi to 1.3 and vf = 0
1/2vi^2 = mgL(1-cosθ)
and find θ, which I got 31.1 then I subtracted Lcos30 by Lcos31.1 and got .005 m. The answer is incorrect, can anyone help? BTW I already canceled out the mass in all the above work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems you forgot the m's in your kinetic energies??
 
Hi 386221

Welcome to PF!

Your work looks good to me .What is the correct answer ?
 
I haven't checked the data, Tanya Sharma, but it seems that OP is using 1/2v^2, rather than 1/2mv^2.
I agree that OP, apart from that seems to have chosen a correct, if somewhat overcomplicated solution since there is no need to use the intermediate position at the bottom.
 
386221 said:

Homework Statement


You are given a pendulum composed of a 0.030 kg mass on the end of a 0.60 m long massless string. If the pendulum is moved 30° from the vertical and given an initial speed of 0.39 m/s tangent to the support string and away from the vertical, how much higher relative to the release point of the pendulum swing will the pendulum rise?


Homework Equations


KE=1/2mv^2
PE=mgL(1-cosθ)


The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I did. I found the velocity at the bottom of the swing.
1/2vf^2 = 1/2vi^2 + mgL(1-cosθ)
and I got vf= 1.3 m/s
Then I did the same thing again, except I set vi to 1.3 and vf = 0
1/2vi^2 = mgL(1-cosθ)
and find θ, which I got 31.1 then I subtracted Lcos30 by Lcos31.1 and got .005 m. The answer is incorrect, can anyone help? BTW I already canceled out the mass in all the above work.
check again.
 
arildno said:
I haven't checked the data, Tanya Sharma, but it seems that OP is using 1/2v^2, rather than 1/2mv^2.
I agree that OP, apart from that seems to have chosen a correct, if somewhat overcomplicated solution since there is no need to use the intermediate position at the bottom.

I checked the data before replying.OP has mentioned that he canceled the masses in his work,which he/she did.He/She has erroneously written 1/2v^2 instead of 1/2mv^2.
 
`Well, then his "incorrect" answer might just mean that he rounded off numbers in an incorrect way in his intermediate step.
Thank you, Tanya Sharma, for having checked the data! :smile:
 
For an easier method just set potential energy at the point of beginning of motion as 0.
##U_i+K_i=U_f+K_f##
##K_i=U_f##
##1/2(mv^2)=mg\Delta h##
 
There is a couple of sources for errors which might explain the incorrectness of OP's answer:
1. He might at some point have made a mix-up of radians versus degrees.
2. Or, and I think this is the likeliest source for the error error: the arccosine function is typically defined relative to the interval 0 to pi, while in this problem, the answer might have be given for angles in the interval -pi/2 to pi/2 instead. That is, a minus sign might be missing in OP's solution for the angle.
 
  • #10
The angle is slightly off...31.0323136133
(and there was another error in cos31.1)
 
  • #11
I tried changing the second angle to 31.03 and got delta h of .009 and it was wrong. I also tried using 1/2mv^2=mgh and got .0077 for h and that was wrong as well. I honestly have no clue on how to proceed all my work seems correct...
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top