Pendulum with spring instead of rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of modeling a pendulum that uses a spring instead of a solid rod. Unlike a simple pendulum with one degree of freedom (the angle), this setup introduces two degrees of freedom: the angle and the spring's extension. Traditional methods like Euler's or Runge Kutta are mentioned as suitable for simpler models, but the spring complicates the equations of motion. Lagrangian mechanics is suggested as a standard approach to derive the necessary equations for this non-harmonic oscillation. The conversation emphasizes the need for a dedicated thread to maintain forum organization.
nneutrino
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
When we have solid rod instead of spring I can solve this problem in Microsoft Excel either with Euler´s method or Runge Kutta method, but that spring makes this problem hard for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That problem is a lot more complicated. Basically, instead of the one degree of freedom that you had for the simple pendulum (the angle), you have two (the angle, and the extension of the spring). The standard way to solve such a problem is to obtain the equations (note that I said it in plural) of motion with, say, Lagrangian mechanics. To keep this thread dedicated to its original title (Non-harmonic oscillation of pendulum) it would probably be better if you created a new thread with this question to keep the forum neatly organized. :oldbiggrin:
 
Hi,
Can you help me to find out appropriate numerical model of calculating position depending on time of special pendulum. It is basically gravity pendulum but we have a spring instead of rod. (picture)
300px-Simple_gravity_pendulum.svg.png
 
Thread closed for Moderation...

Edit (fresh_42): Post #3 is actually the opening post, which has been separated from another thread.
Thread re-opened.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top