Penrose diagram of black hole with a changing event horizon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the behavior of Penrose diagrams in the context of black holes, specifically regarding the effects of additional matter falling into a black hole and the implications for photons at the event horizon during both black hole formation and evaporation. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications related to black hole dynamics and Penrose diagram interpretation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the Penrose diagram changes when additional matter falls into a black hole, suggesting that the diagram must reflect an increase in the black hole's radius.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial description of the Penrose diagram, stating that the horizon remains a 45-degree line regardless of changes in the black hole's mass.
  • Concerns are raised about the fate of a photon emitted at the moment of black hole formation, with one participant suggesting it may appear to move outward due to the diagram's representation.
  • There is a discussion on whether a photon trapped at the event horizon during black hole evaporation remains at the horizon until the black hole evaporates completely.
  • One participant emphasizes that the Penrose diagram is constructed using the entire history of spacetime, which affects how local dynamics are represented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the behavior of photons at the event horizon and the representation of the Penrose diagram, but there are nuances in understanding the implications of these representations, particularly regarding local versus global perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of using global coordinates in Penrose diagrams and how this affects the interpretation of photon behavior during black hole dynamics.

Sonderval
Messages
234
Reaction score
11
Dear all,

I have a question on Penrose diagrams. Consider a collapsing star that forms a black hole with a Schwarzschild radius normalized to 1. What happens in the Penrose diagram when additional matter falls in? I suspect the diagram then has to look like this :
BHcollapse8.png

When the outer shell (second curved line) reaches the event horizon, the radius of the BH will increase (r>1). Is this diagram correct? If so, what would happen when a photon is emitted exactly at the moment the BH forms? This photon would then be frozen at the event horizon, but from the diagram it seems as if it could actually move outward to the greater event horizon (because it follows a 45-degree line). Or is this way of thinking incorrect and the diagram looks different?

The second question is related. Here is the diagram for an evaporating BH (from inspirehep)
PenroseBlackHoleOld.png

Again, I am wondering what happens to a photon trapped at the event horizon when the hole shrinks? Will it be "sucked inwards" and stay at the event horizon until the BH has evaporated completely and will then emerge from the r=0-position?
Thanks for any help,
Martin
 

Attachments

  • BHcollapse8.png
    BHcollapse8.png
    13 KB · Views: 1,824
  • PenroseBlackHoleOld.png
    PenroseBlackHoleOld.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 1,498
Physics news on Phys.org
Sonderval said:
What happens in the Penrose diagram when additional matter falls in?

Basically what you describe, yes.

Sonderval said:
what happens to a photon trapped at the event horizon when the hole shrinks?

It stays at the horizon. That's the definition of the horizon.

Remember that the Penrose diagram is using coordinates that have been specially adjusted to make the horizon be that particular 45 degree up and to the right line, regardless of what happens to the hole. It can gain mass from things falling in, lose mass by evaporation, and even disappear, as your second diagram shows, and none of that changes the horizon line--because the Penrose diagram coordinates are adjusted, using the entire history of the spacetime as input, to make the horizon line look like that.

In other words, the Penrose diagram is not very helpful if you want to understand the dynamics of the spacetime--what things look like locally to a particular observer. The purpose of the Penrose diagram is to easily show certain global properties of the spacetime, which is why it has to use the entire global history of the spacetime for its construction. From a local observer's viewpoint, a Penrose diagram can't even be constructed; the observer would have to know the entire future history of the entire spacetime to know where on a Penrose diagram his particular worldline fits.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sonderval
@PeterDonis
Thanks a lot.
PeterDonis said:
It stays at the horizon. That's the definition of the horizon.
I assume the same is true for the case of the expanding hole.
I find this somewhat surprising - the black hole expands and the photon moves "outwards" - but that's probably simply a consequence of using global coordinates. OTOH, it shows that Penrose diagrams are really useful for eactly this kind of consideration.
Thanks again,
Martin.
 
Sonderval said:
I assume the same is true for the case of the expanding hole.

Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K