Perfectly inelastic collision problem, need some help

AI Thread Summary
An 8g bullet is fired into a 250g block at rest on a 1m high table, resulting in a perfectly inelastic collision. After the impact, the block and bullet land 2m away from the table's edge. The conservation of momentum equation is applied, leading to the equation (0.008)vi = (0.258)vf. The user calculates the time of flight using kinematic equations and finds the initial speed of the bullet to be 143 m/s. The solution is confirmed as correct, providing reassurance to the user.
eadel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An 8g bullet is fired into a 250g block that is initially at rest at the edge of a table of height 1m. The bullet remains in the block, and after the impact the block lands 2m from the bottom of the table. Determine the initial speed of the bullet. [To clarify, the block, after getting hit by the bullet, gets knocked off a 1m tall table and lands 2m away from where it started. no friction either.]


Homework Equations


m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
p=mv

The Attempt at a Solution


before the collision, i have...

m1v1i + m2v2i = (m1+m2)vf

plug in the data...

(0.008)vi + 0 = (0.258)vf


and that's where I'm stumped. I tried using delta-y=v0*t + 1/2at^2 to solve for t and then plug into solve for the velocity in the x direction... (v=d/t)... and then using that as my vf to solve for my vi... and even though the answer LOOKED right (143 m/s) i got the strange feeling it was wrong. any suggestions or leads guys?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, eadel, welcome to PF!
eadel said:
I tried using delta-y=v0*t + 1/2at^2 to solve for t and then plug into solve for the velocity in the x direction... (v=d/t)... and then using that as my vf to solve for my vi... and even though the answer LOOKED right (143 m/s) i got the strange feeling it was wrong. any suggestions or leads guys?
No suggestions or leads are required, your method and solution are perfect!:approve:
 
PhanthomJay said:
Hello, eadel, welcome to PF!No suggestions or leads are required, your method and solution are perfect!:approve:

thank you!

and i can't believe i was right lol, i even went as far as erasing everything :'(

oh well, thanks a lot for the verifcation!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top