Perhaps delta function or inverse Laplace transform?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation involving an integral and a Dirac delta function. The equation can be approached by taking the Laplace transform, which simplifies the problem into an algebraic equation for I(s). The right side of the equation will consist of two terms, one related to the initial value of i and the other involving the Laplace transform of the integral with the unit step function u(t). Utilizing integration by parts can help avoid complications when dealing with the integral. The convolution theorem for Laplace transforms may also be useful in finding the solution for i(t).
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
i have this question and not even sure how to approach it:

\frac {di}{dt}+4i+3\int_{0^-}^t{i(z)dz = 12(t-1)u(t-1)

and i(0^-) = 0

find i(t)

last topics we covered were laplace transforms (and inverse) and dirac delta function.
At least some hint to get me started would be a great help.

EDIT:
oh, and again u(t) = 1 for t >= 0 and u(t) = 0 elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would get rid of the integral by taking the derivative of the entire equation - which gives you a second order differential equation and leads you into the LaPlace transform.
 
Laplace transform the equation directly. To find the transform of the integral, just do an integration by parts. That will avoid complications on the right side. :)
 
thanks for replies, as i looked further through the book, we actually have an entry in the table for this integral, but what do I do with i for Laplace transform? it does not have u(t)...
 
Ev,

I presume that your goal is to solve for i(t). After performing the Laplace transforms, you will have an algebraic equation for I(s). The right side will have two terms. One will relate to the initial value of i and the other will be a product of an algebraic quantity with the Laplace transform of the integral containing u. You should have no difficulty inverting the first part and you should be able to do something with the second using the convolution theorem for Laplace transforms.

Let us know what you end up with!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top