Period for real-life spring experiment

AI Thread Summary
In a real spring experiment, the period of oscillation may differ from theoretical predictions due to factors such as damping effects from air resistance, heat generated by the spring's flexing, and the mass of the spring itself. While air resistance was initially considered, it was concluded that its impact on the period is minimal. Additionally, the discussion highlights that real springs exhibit complexities like twisting and side-to-side motion, which can further influence the period. A related problem about a second grader on a swing emphasizes that damping from air and friction causes deceleration, suggesting that assistance from a friend could help maintain a constant period. Overall, the conversation explores the intricacies of real-world oscillators compared to idealized models.
doppelganger007
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question from a lab experiment for an online course. The question states "In a real spring experiment, you wouldn't expect the period predicted by the formula for the period of a harmonic oscillator. What is the reason for this, and the would the actual value be larger or smaller than the predicted one?"

My partner and I initially thought it was air resistance, but we finally concluded that air resistance would not have an affect on the period of the spring. The spring in question is one that is hanging downward with a mass attached to it. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air could have a very small effect on the frequency, making the oscillator behave as a damped oscillator. Some damping could also come from heat generated by flexing the spring. An additional consideration might be the mass of the spring itself. The effects of damping are modeled as a velocity dependent resistance to the motion.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/oscda.html
 
Thanks OlderDan, now I have another related problem. It asks about why a second grader on a swing who tries to maintain a constant period keeps slowing down. Isn't it then because of damping, as with the spring? And also, what could then be done to "combat" the deceleration and thus maintain a constant period?
 
doppelganger007 said:
Thanks OlderDan, now I have another related problem. It asks about why a second grader on a swing who tries to maintain a constant period keeps slowing down. Isn't it then because of damping, as with the spring? And also, what could then be done to "combat" the deceleration and thus maintain a constant period?
For a swing, that cool breeze you feel is in fact always slowing you down. There is also some friction in the pivot points. A second grader might appreciate the help of a friend doing what?
 
Real springs do have mass. Also in a real experiment one would expect the up and down motion to include swinging from side to side. How this would actually influence the period is beyond me.
 
andrevdh said:
Real springs do have mass. Also in a real experiment one would expect the up and down motion to include swinging from side to side. How this would actually influence the period is beyond me.
Even without the swinging motion, there is a twisting effect. The spring winds and unwinds as it stretches and relaxes. This looks like a nice discussion of the situation, and includes a brief discussion of other two-degree-of freedom systems.

http://online.redwoods.cc.ca.us/instruct/darnold/deproj/sp04/stevemisay/Project1.pdf

Adding your swinging would make it 3-degrees if it stayed in a plane and another if it does not. Messy stuff when all is said and done, but there are simple examples of coupled oscillators where the energy migrates from one mode to another. Two pendula connected by a light spring for example.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top