Period of oscillation of dip needle

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
1)The time period of a dip needle vibrating in the vertical plane in the magnetic meridian is 3 seconds. When the same magnetic needle is made to vibrate in the horizontal plane, the time period of vibration is 3(2)^(1/2). What is the angle of dip of the place?
I think in both the cases, it is the horizontal component of earth’s magnetic field that exerts a restoring couple on the dip needle and causes it to oscillate. But how to go further?Please give an idea on how to solve this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amith2006 said:
1)The time period of a dip needle vibrating in the vertical plane in the magnetic meridian is 3 seconds. When the same magnetic needle is made to vibrate in the horizontal plane, the time period of vibration is 3(2)^(1/2). What is the angle of dip of the place?
I think in both the cases, it is the horizontal component of earth’s magnetic field that exerts a restoring couple on the dip needle and causes it to oscillate. But how to go further?Please give an idea on how to solve this problem.
My interpretation: When the needle is in the vertical plane in the magnetic meridian it should be free to align with the full magnetic field. When it is horizontal, it can only align with the horizontal component.
 
Last edited:
That's great!Thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top