Period of Oscillations near equator

AI Thread Summary
A bead on a frictionless wire at the equator oscillates when displaced due to the effective gravitational force not pointing directly towards the Earth's center. The discussion highlights the need to consider the centrifugal force, which acts to pull the bead back towards the equator, leading to oscillatory motion similar to a mass-spring system. Participants debate the correct approach to derive the period of oscillation, suggesting the use of equations of motion and the net forces acting on the bead. A diagram illustrating the forces in the north-south and vertical planes is recommended for clarity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of analyzing all forces, including fictitious ones, in the system.
Decadohedron
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bead slides along a frictionless wire which lies in the N/S direction, midpoint at the equator. All points along the wire are the same distance from the center of the earth. The bead is initially at rest then released a small distance, δ, to the north of the equator. Because of effective g doesn't point directly towards the Earth's center, there is a small component along the wire that always points back towards the equator. This means that when released, the bead will oscillate back and forth just like a mass on a spring. What is the period of these oscillations?

Homework Equations


Coriolis force would be 0 as the bead is fixed on a wire, and the centrifugal force would be the force always pointing it back towards the equator - thus the formula being

1.
-GMm/r2 + mω2r = 0

2.
T = 2π√(m/k); ω2=m/k

The Attempt at a Solution



I was going to solve for ω and then just plug into the Period formula of the mass-spring system. But it seems overly simple and feels like I'm missing something.

Am I on the right track or should I be thinking about this differently??

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Decadohedron said:
-GMm/r2 + mω2r = 0
It isn't in orbit.
 
haruspex said:
It isn't in orbit.

So I should be using mr'' = -GMm/r2 + mω2r instead and solve the PDE and go from there?
 
Decadohedron said:
So I should be using mr'' = -GMm/r2 + mω2r instead and solve the PDE and go from there?
What about the forces from the wire?
 
haruspex said:
What about the forces from the wire?

There would be the parallel component in the r direction mω2rcos2(Φ) + the perpendicular component mω2rsin(Φ)cos(Φ)
 
Decadohedron said:
There would be the parallel component in the r direction mω2rcos2(Φ) + the perpendicular component mω2rsin(Φ)cos(Φ)
You don't need to calculate the forces from the wire, just take them into account in your analysis.

Draw a diagram in the NS, up-down plane showing the bead at latitude Φ. What forces act (centrifugal being a fictitious force)? What is the net force?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top