Periodic Surface Waves Produced by Non-Periodic Disturbances

Caveman11
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is part of a past paper I am trying to work through before a physics of fluids exam in a month.The angular frequency ω of a periodic surface wave with wavenumber k on
deep water is
ω = sqrt(gk)
where g is the gravitational acceleration.
Obtain an expression for the wave’s phase velocity in terms of its wavelength
and explain how a localized non-periodic disturbance far out at sea can lead
to approximately periodic surface waves at the shore.
Relevant equations:

V_{p}=\frac{\omega}{k} (Phase Velocity)
3. The Attempt at a Solution : I obtained a value for V_{p} as:

V_{p}=\sqrt{\frac{g\lambda}{2\pi}}

Which I assume to be correct. However I can't explain the fact that you can get periodic waves from non-periodic motion. The only explanation I could think of was that the waves with the same wavelength travel together as they have the same phase velocity where as longer wavelength waves have a higher phase velocity and can overtake the slower ones. This would lead to after a while all the different periods being grouped together?Many Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. That's "dispersion" for ya!
 
I didn't expect it to be be that, Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top