What Is the Drude-Lorentz Model in Relation to Permittivity and Conductivity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between permittivity and conductivity, expressed as ε(ω) = 1 + (4πiσ(ω)/ω). Participants clarify that this formula resembles the definition of complex permittivity, which is often denoted as ϵ(ω) + (iσ(ω)/ω). There is a query about the derivation of this relationship and whether it has a specific name. Additionally, the conversation touches on unit conversions, noting that the original formula may be in cgs units and discussing how to convert it to SI units. The thread highlights the importance of understanding complex permittivity in the context of lossy media.
thefireman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have an relation between permittivity and conductivity as follows:

\epsilon(\omega) = 1 + \frac{4\pi\iota\sigma(\omega)}{\omega}

Yet am unclear as to how it was derived. Does this relationship have a name and/or derivation to follow through somewhere? also, I believe it is cgs units, what is the SI equivalent?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thefireman said:
I have an relation between permittivity and conductivity as follows:

\epsilon(\omega) = 1 + \frac{4\pi\iota\sigma(\omega)}{\omega}

Yet am unclear as to how it was derived. Does this relationship have a name and/or derivation to follow through somewhere? also, I believe it is cgs units, what is the SI equivalent?

Thanks

Hi thefireman! :smile:

(i think you just leave out the 4π … or is it 4πe0 ? … to get SI units)

this looks a bit like like the "complex permittivity" definition …

\hat{\epsilon}(\omega)\ =\ \epsilon(\omega) + \frac{\iota\sigma(\omega)}{\omega} is the "complex permittivity"

… see eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permittivity#Lossy_medium

… but with a different notation
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top