Perpendicular Lines: Slope, Angle & Equations

Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
A very simple and noob question, sorry for this.

Looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpendicular I found that two lines are perpendicular if and only if the product of their slopes is -1.

If I have two lines described by the following equations:

y = ax + b
g = cx + d

then they're perpendicular if ac = -1 right? Okay...

What's the explanation for this? How do I conclude that they're only perpendicular if and only if the product of their slopes is -1?

Just another little question: the slope of a line is the tangent of the angle between the line and the x-axis? that's right?

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
HI Taturana! :smile:
Taturana said:
How do I conclude that they're only perpendicular if and only if the product of their slopes is -1?

Just another little question: the slope of a line is the tangent of the angle between the line and the x-axis? that's right?

That's right :smile: … slope = tan, and so …

tan(90º + θ) = sin(90º + θ)/cos(90º + θ) = cosθ/(-sinθ) = -1/tanθ. :wink:

(or you can prove it just as easily by drawing it)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top