Perpetual Motion: Ideas & Input Welcome

AI Thread Summary
Perpetual motion remains a contentious topic with little progress over the years, leading to skepticism among forum members. The original poster expresses a desire to share an idea but prefers to wait until it is physically tested. There is a strong sentiment that discussions on perpetual motion are unproductive and tiresome. The community appears disinterested in engaging further on this subject. Overall, the thread highlights a reluctance to explore ideas related to perpetual motion due to historical failures.
bucky1andonly
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
well, here's the thing, i have an idea and would love to share with everyone, but until i physically test it I am not going to, but if anyone has any input on the subject i would love to hear it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any input on your idea which you don't want to share?

Not going to happen!
 
Perpetual motion subject is tiresome and have not amounted to anything for eons. This is not a subject to be discussed in this forum.

Zz.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top