Schools Personal statement for grad school with research experience in the wrong field

AI Thread Summary
When writing a personal statement for grad school in pure mathematics, it's crucial to balance the details of research experience with the focus of the application. While it's important to showcase involvement in research, especially from an REU in a different field like experimental physics, excessive technical detail can divert attention from the intended focus on mathematics. Highlighting specific contributions and demonstrating active engagement in the project is essential, but the narrative should remain aligned with the applicant's interest in pure mathematics. Emphasizing transferable skills and insights gained from the research experience can effectively bridge the gap between the two fields without overwhelming the statement with irrelevant technical jargon.
Epsilon36819
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am currently writing my personal statement for the application to grad school in pure mathematics. I am aware that grad school comitees usually want to hear about the specifics of your research experience: the project, your role in it, etc. However, my only research experience was from an REU completed in a very experimental field of physics. I wanted to know to what extent should I provide the details of my project.

On one hand, providing lots of details confirms that I knew exactly what I was doing, knew my role in the group and gives indication that I was not simply a mindless technical worker. However, I feel that giving the details, because of the technical terms and specifics, derails the spirit of the letter towards experimental physics, which is NOT the field that I am interested in.

Would anybody experienced with this have suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be specific.
 
I agree. You want to demonstrate that you were actively engaged in the research that you took part in.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top