Perturbed in the harmonic oscillator

Fatimah od
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



486987655.png


Homework Equations



289028545.png


The Attempt at a Solution



for part a I do not know how to write it in power series form ?

for part b :
I chose the perturbed H' is v(x)= (1+ε )K x^2 /2
then I started integrate E_1 = ∫ H' ψ^2 dx

the problem was , the result equals to ∞ !

shall I integrate in the interval [ 0,∞ ] !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fatimah od said:
for part a I do not know how to write it in power series form ?

You are given E_n = (n + \frac12)\hbar\sqrt{k/m}. k is now k(1+\epsilon), so E_n is now
<br /> E_n = \left(n + \frac12\right)\hbar\sqrt{\frac km(1 + \epsilon)} = <br /> \left(n + \frac12\right)\hbar\sqrt{\frac km}(1 + \epsilon)^{1/2}<br />
Since |\epsilon| &lt; 1, (1 + \epsilon)^{1/2} can be expanded in a binomial series.
 
ok , I do it thanks

any help for second part please
 
Fatimah od said:
ok , I do it thanks

any help for second part please

I can't help you with that unless you tell me how your textbook defines H&#039;, E_n^1 and \psi_n^0. I am prepared to guess that you have
E_n = E_n^0 + \epsilon E_n^1 + O(\epsilon^2)\\<br /> \psi_n = \psi_n^0 +\epsilon\psi_n^1 + O(\epsilon^2)
but I'm not prepared to guess what H&#039; might be. However I suspect the method is to substitute the above into the Schrodinger equation to get
<br /> (E_n^0 + \epsilon E_n^1)(\psi_n^0 + \epsilon \psi_n^1) = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2} (\psi_n^0 + \epsilon\psi_n^1) + \frac{kx^2}{2}(1 + \epsilon)(\psi_n^0 +\epsilon\psi_n^1)<br />
and then require that the coefficients of \epsilon^0 and \epsilon^1 should vanish. At some stage you may want to take an inner product with \langle\psi_n^0|, and recall that
H_0 = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2} + \frac{kx^2}{2}
is self-adjoint (\langle f | H_0 | g \rangle = \langle g | H_0 | f \rangle for all f and g).
 
Your H' is wrong, or you're not expressing yourself clearly. H' is the difference between the complete Hamiltonian and the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

Show us how you're getting that the integral diverges. The problem seems to lie in your evaluation of the integral.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top