Peskin and Schroeder - page 4 - choice of notation

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
In page 4, Peskin and Schroeder has the following diagram:

Capture.jpg


The diagram shows the collision of an electron beam and a positron beam to produce a ##\mu^{+}## beam a ##\mu^{-}## beam.

My question is this:

The electron and positron beams are shown to have momenta ##\textbf{p}## and ##\textbf{p}'##.

But the muon beams are shown to have momenta ##\textbf{k}## and ##\textbf{k}'##.

##\textbf{p}## is standard notation for momentum, but ##\textbf{k}## is standard notation for wavevector. But then, in natural units, ##\hbar=1##.

Therefore, is the different use of symbols for momenta a matter of notational difference, or is there some underlying physics I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can call things whatever you like as long as you define what is meant. Throughout PS you will notice p, k, and q being used to denote different momenta (and more importantly, 4-momenta) simply for the reason that the others are being used to denote something else in the particular context.
 
Thanks! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top