Peskin complex scalar field current

Dansuer
Messages
81
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


i'm trying to calculate the charge operator for a complex scalar field. I've got the overal problem right but I'm confused about this:
On page 18 of Peskin, it is written that the conserved current of a complex scalar field, associated with the transformation ##\phi \rightarrow \phi e^{\alpha \phi}##, is
$$ j^\mu = i(\partial^\mu \phi^*) \phi - i \phi^* (\partial^\mu \phi)$$
I'm trying to recalculate it.

Homework Equations



$$ j^\mu = \frac{\delta L}{\delta (\partial_\mu \phi)} \delta \phi +
\frac{\delta L}{\delta (\partial_\mu \phi^*)} \delta \phi^* $$
##\delta \phi = i \phi## and ##\delta \phi^* = -i \phi^*##

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the above equations i get
$$ j^\mu = i(\partial^\mu \phi^*) \phi - i (\partial^\mu \phi) \phi^*$$
and since i will later promote ##\phi## to an operator the order is important. Or not ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because when i calculate the charge operator, which is the time component of the conserved current, I get a different answer than the one in Peskin.Where am i wrong ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top