PGRE question: angular freq of small oscillations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a potential function V(x) = -ax² + bx⁴, where a and b are positive constants, and the calculation of the angular frequency of small oscillations around its minima. The correct answer for the angular frequency is given as 2(a/m)^(1/2). A participant questions the logic of substituting a = -1/2 k and b = 0 to derive the familiar harmonic oscillator frequency of √(k/m), pointing out a perceived inconsistency. However, it is clarified that since both a and b must be positive, a cannot equal -1/2 k, as this would imply a maximum at x = 0 rather than a minimum, which is necessary for oscillatory motion. The minima occur at x = ±√(a/2b), confirming that oscillations can only occur around these points, not at x = 0.
Aziza
Messages
189
Reaction score
1
Problem from past PGRE:

A particle of mass m moves in a one-dimensional potential V(x)=-ax2 + bx4, where a and b are positive constants. The angular frequency of small oscillations about the minima of the potential is equal to:

Answer is 2(a/m)1/2.

I understand how this is found 'the long way' by actually applying calculus, but if you plug in a=-1/2 k and b=0 shouldn't you get back sqrt(k/m) ? Because the harmonic potential is 1/2kx^2 ... so where is the flaw in my logic?Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aziza said:
Problem from past PGRE:

A particle of mass m moves in a one-dimensional potential V(x)=-ax2 + bx4, where a and b are positive constants. The angular frequency of small oscillations about the minima of the potential is equal to:

Answer is 2(a/m)1/2.

I understand how this is found 'the long way' by actually applying calculus, but if you plug in a=-1/2 k, shouldn't you get back sqrt(k/m) ? Because the harmonic potential is 1/2kx^2 ... so where is the flaw in my logic?


Thanks!

If the potential was 1/2 kx2+bx4, there would be oscillation about x=0. But the problem says that both a and b are positive constants. So a can not be equal to -1/2 k where k is positive.

In case a>0 and b>0, the potential function has maximum at x=0. You do not get oscillatory motion about x=0. The minima are at x=±√(a/2b). Oscillatory motion is possible about a minimum of the potential function.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top